Judge Davis
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
sender
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Josefsberg
|
Appointer appointee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-01-04 | N/A | Proposed date for Epstein's plea and sentencing hearing. | Court | View |
| 2007-11-26 | N/A | Judge Davis undergoing foot surgery. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Call to Judge Davis regarding his willingness to serve as the 'decider'. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-15 | N/A | Drafting of a Special Master Letter to Judge Davis regarding Epstein victims. | Florida | View |
EFTA00013949.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SD FL) to Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Lefkowitz and Black) dated August 20, 2008. The letter addresses the implementation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, specifically the payment of fees to Special Master representative Robert Josefsberg and disputes regarding victim notification lists. The U.S. Attorney offers an ultimatum: stick to the September 2007 victim list (leaving Epstein open to prosecution for later-identified victims) or include victims known as of June 30, 2008, which would require Epstein to compensate them.
EFTA00013758.pdf
This document contains an email chain between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) in late November 2007. The correspondence reveals a significant dispute regarding the government's intention to notify alleged victims about the case under the 'Justice for All Act,' to which the defense strongly objects, arguing it would cause reputational damage and spur civil litigation before a plea is entered. The emails also discuss the selection of attorneys Podhurst and Josephsberg for a role in the proceedings, which the defense ultimately accepts.
EFTA00013754.pdf
This document contains a November 2007 email thread involving the US Attorney's Office (Alex Acosta cc'd) discussing the logistics of Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing. Key topics include the strategic scheduling of the plea/sentencing on December 16th to 'reduce media frenzy,' the legal nuances of his 'sexual predator' designation, and the loophole allowing the Sheriff's Office (rather than State Corrections) to grant him work release. The emails also detail coordination with Epstein's lawyers (Lefkowitz and Goldberger) regarding victim notification and potential conflicts of interest.
EFTA00013750.pdf
An email chain from October 2007 between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and redacted government officials (CC'ing Alex Acosta). The correspondence discusses legal strategy, specifically an agreement where liability would not be contested for specific victims ('girls on our list'), limiting discovery to damages rather than claim veracity. It also references Judge Davis's willingness to serve as a 'decider' and the execution of an addendum.
EFTA00013745.pdf
A letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez, dated October 9, 2007. Acosta rejects a proposal regarding the resolution of victim claims under the Non-Prosecution Agreement and instead proposes using Judge Davis to select attorneys for the victims and potentially serve as a mediator for out-of-court settlements paid for by Epstein. Acosta also mentions attempting to coordinate with other defense team members Jay Lefkowitz and Guy Lewis.
EFTA00013706.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 27, 2007, between the U.S. Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida) and Jay Lefkowitz, a lawyer for Jeffrey Epstein, with Alex Acosta CC'd. The emails discuss the selection of Aaron Podhurst and Bob Josephsberg (likely as mediators or special masters) and the government's statutory obligation under the Justice for All Act of 2004 to notify victims of the agreement with Epstein. The AUSA insists that vetting conclude immediately so that victims can be notified by November 29, 2007.
EFTA00013703.pdf
This document is an email dated November 13, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the Epstein case. The sender is drafting a response to a letter from 'Jay' (likely Jay Lefkowitz) and is inquiring whether 'Judge Davis' has selected a lawyer, asking for the name to be included in the response.
EFTA00013698.pdf
Legal correspondence from Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, to prosecutor Jeffrey Sloman regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The letter defends Epstein's agents contacting potential witnesses, confirms the plea and sentencing date of January 4, 2008, and insists on Epstein receiving an 18-month sentence with standard Florida state work release privileges ('equal treatment'). Lefkowitz also raises concerns about the government's handling of victim representation under 18 U.S.C. ยง 2255.
EFTA00013695.pdf
This document is an internal email chain within the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated October 15, 2007. It involves Alex Acosta and redacted Assistant U.S. Attorneys discussing a draft letter to Judge Davis regarding the Epstein case. Specifically, the correspondence focuses on confirming the 'final number of victims' to be included in a 'Special Master Letter.'
EFTA00013628.pdf
An email chain from November 7, 2007, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach. The attorney asks a colleague if there is news from the defense, State Attorney, or Judge Davis, and reports a concerning development where private investigators have approached girls who were not part of the state's case against Epstein. The recipient replies simply with 'No.'
EFTA00013622.pdf
An email dated October 24, 2007, from a redacted sender at USAFLS (likely US Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida) to Jay Lefkowitz, with Alex Acosta copied. The email attaches a document titled '071015_Special_Master_Letter5.wpd' and describes it as the final version of a letter to Judge Davis regarding the Epstein case.
EFTA00013619.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from October 16-22, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted prosecutor. The correspondence details negotiations regarding a letter to 'Judge Davis' (a proposed special master) concerning the selection of legal representation for Epstein's victims. Key points of contention include whether Judge Davis would represent the victims directly, the criteria for the selected law firm, statutory compensation limits ($150k vs $50k), and the inclusion of language regarding discovery to test the veracity of victims' claims.
EFTA00013618.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 19, 2007, discussing legal strategy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondents discuss a lawsuit filed in New York that has reached national news (Fox and ABC), expressing belief that this lawsuit is delaying Epstein's change of plea. The emails reveal that 'Epstein's camp' allegedly planted false stories to discredit victims and are attempting to resolve the civil lawsuit before the guilty plea to avoid it being used against him. The chain also references communicating with a 'Jay' regarding a proposed letter and asking Judge Davis about the Special Master's selection.
EFTA00013612.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (Alex Acosta and a redacted AUSA). The emails discuss and finalize the text of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. The addendum clarifies the process for appointing an independent third party to select an attorney representative for the victims and stipulates that Epstein will pay the representative's fees but is not obligated to fund contested litigation against himself.
EFTA00013538.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida), signed on behalf of Alexander Acosta, to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz. The letter aggressively rebuts Lefkowitz's allegations of misconduct, specifically denying a conflict of interest regarding the potential appointment of Bert Ocariz and defending the office's handling of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and victim notifications. The author expresses surprise at the attacks given previous cooperation and asserts that the office made significant concessions to Epstein during negotiations.
EFTA00013528.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2007 between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS). The correspondence concerns the scheduling of Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing hearings. Lefkowitz asserts that the Court confirmed a date of January 4th for both the plea and sentencing on 'agreed-upon counts,' while USAFLS staff discuss conflicting dates (Dec 14/16) internally and await confirmation from Judge Davis.
EFTA00013521.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 30-31, 2007, between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The correspondence discusses the execution of an addendum, the role of Judge Davis, and the handling of discovery/subpoenas to verify claims. The government official clarifies that Epstein has waived his right to contest liability and damages under the agreement and that their office's role is strictly limited to monitoring potential breaches of the NPA.
EFTA00013518.pdf
This document is an email dated October 24, 2007, regarding the Epstein case. The sender (redacted) writes to Jay Lefkowitz, copying Alex Acosta (USAFLS), to provide a revised letter and addendum for Judge Davis. The email details minor formatting changes to the addendum and requests Lefkowitz execute and return the documents via PDF and Fed Ex.
EFTA00013515.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from October 2007 between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, and officials from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), including references to US Attorney Alex Acosta. The correspondence details tense negotiations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement, specifically focusing on the selection of a 'Special Master' or attorney representative for the victims, the compensation limits (150k vs 50k), and language allowing for the 'veracity of the victims' claims' to be tested. The government sets a strict deadline for a deal, stating they have made their final concessions.
EFTA00013499.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted Assistant US Attorney. The correspondence concerns the drafting of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. Key points of negotiation include the selection process for an 'independent third-party' to represent victims and the stipulation that Epstein would pay this representative's fees, but not costs associated with contested litigation against him.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-10-09 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Judge Davis | $0.00 | Potential payment of mediator fees if victims a... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity