This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys (MS. MOE and MR. EVERDELL) regarding a note received from the jury. The judge directs the attorneys to review jury instruction number 21. Ms. Moe, representing the government, states that it is within the court's discretion to set the deliberation schedule and agrees that the jury should be advised to expect an extended session the next day.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Counsel (implied) |
Speaking to the court on behalf of the government regarding jury deliberations.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Counsel (implied) |
Speaking to the court, agreeing to the court's instruction but noting a prior objection.
|
| Ms. Williams |
Mentioned as handing something to the CSO.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge/Honor |
Presiding over the proceedings, addressing a jury note, and instructing counsel.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed as the court reporting service at the bottom of the document.
|
"I refer you to instruction number 21 on page 28. Please consider carefully the full instruction."Source
"Without waiving our prior objection."Source
"And the government's view is that is within the Court's discretion certainly to set a schedule for jury deliberations. Given the circumstances, we agree that it's prudent to advise the jury that, barring any scheduling complications, they should expect an extended day tomorrow."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,444 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document