EFTA00019029.pdf
74.9 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
4
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email correspondence / legal communication
File Size:
74.9 KB
Summary
This document contains an email thread from March 22, 2021, between Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP and likely government prosecutors regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence discusses a 'meet and confer' requirement ordered by Judge Nathan concerning redactions to 'Exhibit 11' and references a sealed document ('Exhibit H') from a civil docket before Judge Preska. The government (implied sender of the top email) asks Everdell if they wish to keep certain quotations redacted given they are sealed in the civil case.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Christian Everdell | Attorney |
Sender of the initial email requesting a meet and confer; Attorney at Cohen & Gresser LLP.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Referenced regarding a court order requiring the parties to meet and confer.
|
| Judge Preska | Judge |
Referenced regarding documents under seal on the civil docket.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Cohen & Gresser LLP |
Law firm representing Christian Everdell.
|
|
| Government |
Implied sender of the response email (based on attachment filename 'Government_Omnibus_Opposition...').
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Cohen & Gresser LLP office location.
|
|
|
Cohen & Gresser LLP office location.
|
|
|
Cohen & Gresser LLP office location.
|
|
|
Cohen & Gresser LLP office location.
|
Relationships (1)
Everdell acting per Judge Nathan's order.
Key Quotes (3)
"We note that the redactions contained on pages 118 to 119 redact quotations from and references to a document that you filed under seal (Exhibit H)."Source
EFTA00019029.pdf
Quote #1
"We understand that the quoted portions of that document are also under seal on the civil docket before Judge Preska."Source
EFTA00019029.pdf
Quote #2
"We will defer to you on whether these should be redacted."Source
EFTA00019029.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,366 characters)
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: Meet and Confer
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 19:01:58 +0000
Attachments: Exhibit_11_(Proposed_Redactions_Per_Order).pdf;
2021.02.26_Government_Omnibus_Opposition_to_Maxwell_Defense_Motions_FINAL_(Pr
oposed_Redactions_Per_Order).pdf
Inline-Images: image001.jpg; image002.jpg
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: Meet and Confer
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 19:01:58 +0000
Attachments: Exhibit_11_(Proposed_Redactions_Per_Order).pdf;
2021.02.26_Government_Omnibus_Opposition_to_Maxwell_Defense_Motions_FINAL_(Pr
oposed_Redactions_Per_Order).pdf
Inline-Images: image001.jpg; image002.jpg
Thanks for your email. In accordance with Judge Nathan’s order, we are writing to confer regarding Exhibit 11 and your
cover letter dated March 9, 2021. Attached please find proposed redactions to Exhibit 11. We do not believe any
redactions are necessary to your cover letter.
cover letter dated March 9, 2021. Attached please find proposed redactions to Exhibit 11. We do not believe any
redactions are necessary to your cover letter.
We intend to the file the brief with the redactions as set forth in Judge Nathan’s March 18, 2021 order, attached here for
your convenience. We note that the redactions contained on pages 118 to 119 redact quotations from and references to
a document that you filed under seal (Exhibit H). We understand that the quoted portions of that document are also
under seal on the civil docket before Judge Preska. Given those facts, we wanted to double check with you to see
whether you in fact want those redactions removed. We will defer to you on whether these should be redacted.
your convenience. We note that the redactions contained on pages 118 to 119 redact quotations from and references to
a document that you filed under seal (Exhibit H). We understand that the quoted portions of that document are also
under seal on the civil docket before Judge Preska. Given those facts, we wanted to double check with you to see
whether you in fact want those redactions removed. We will defer to you on whether these should be redacted.
Best,
From: Christian Everdell
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 2:29 PM
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 2:29 PM
Subject: Meet and Confer
–
Per Judge Nathan’s order, we need to meet and confer today about proposed redactions to Exhibit 11 of your opposition
and to our letter dated March 9, 2021 regarding redactions. We are free from now through the rest of the afternoon.
Please let us know what works for you.
and to our letter dated March 9, 2021 regarding redactions. We are free from now through the rest of the afternoon.
Please let us know what works for you.
Regards,
Chris
Christian R Everdell
EFTA00019029
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
New York | Paris | Washington DC | London
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended to be reviewed initially by only
the individual named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or a representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify
the sender by telephone and permanently delete this e-mail. Thank you.
the individual named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or a representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify
the sender by telephone and permanently delete this e-mail. Thank you.
PRIVACY: A complete copy of our privacy policy can be viewed at: https://www.cohengresser.com/privacy-policy
EFTA00019030
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document