Event Details
March 18, 2021
Description
Judge Nathan's Order
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judge Nathan | person | 619 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00019609.jpg
This document is the Table of Contents for a legal brief filed on October 2, 2020 (Document 82 in Case 20-3061). It outlines arguments asserting that the appellate court lacks jurisdiction to hear the appeal and that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order. The document references Judge Nathan and details the structure of the argument spanning 30 pages.
EFTA00019029.pdf
This document contains an email thread from March 22, 2021, between Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP and likely government prosecutors regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence discusses a 'meet and confer' requirement ordered by Judge Nathan concerning redactions to 'Exhibit 11' and references a sealed document ('Exhibit H') from a civil docket before Judge Preska. The government (implied sender of the top email) asks Everdell if they wish to keep certain quotations redacted given they are sealed in the civil case.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Judge Nathan issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order
2020-10-02 • District Court
Submission of Ghislaine Maxwell's Response to Letter Motions to Quash subpoena to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
2021-11-22 • Email/Court Filing
Filing date of the court document (Sentencing submission or transcript).
2022-08-22 • Court
A victim impact statement being delivered to a judge regarding the sentencing of Maxwell.
2023-06-29
An appeal by Ms. Maxwell addressing an order by Judge Nathan declining to modify a criminal protective order. (Case 20-3061)
Date unknown
Post-conviction bail proceedings.
Date unknown
Judge Nathan finding, three times, that the Government established Maxwell is a risk of flight and no bail conditions could reasonably assure her appearance in court.
Date unknown
Judge Preska declined to stay the unsealing process but stated she would reevaluate if Judge Nathan modified the criminal protective order.
Date unknown • Court
Maxwell asked Judge Nathan to modify the Protective Order to allow her to use discovery materials in civil cases.
2020-08-17 • District Court
Order regarding Local Rule 23.1 issued
2021-07-30 • Southern District of New York
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event