This document is page 127 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It captures the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio regarding the methodology of a social science study, specifically debating 'response rates' versus 'dropout rates' and the nature of an interview guide used on 22 expert subjects. The questioning attorney also makes a point about the definition and use of 'leading questions' during the testimony.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness |
Subject to cross-examination regarding social science research methodology.
|
| Unidentified Attorney (Q) | Interrogator |
Conducting the cross-examination.
|
| 22 Unidentified Professionals | Study Subjects |
Experts who were interviewed as part of the study being discussed.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp prefix DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.
|
"Because dropout rate refers to something else. This would be a response rate."Source
"So we have a response rate that's a third less than was asked; right?"Source
"I believe that it was the professionals, the experts who were interviewed."Source
"You know what a leading question is; right? ... That was just a leading question; right?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,201 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document