HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013583.jpg

2.09 MB

Extraction Summary

12
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Scientific/academic text (page from a book or paper)
File Size: 2.09 MB
Summary

This document is page 83 of a scientific text, likely part of a larger collection reviewed by the House Oversight Committee regarding Jeffrey Epstein (indicated by the Bates stamp). The text discusses advanced mathematical concepts relating to dynamical systems, specifically 'generating partitions,' the 'Sinai-Ruelle-Bowen (SRB) measure,' and 'metric entropy.' It details the historical academic contributions of several prominent mathematicians, including Kolmogorov, Shannon, and Ornstein, and lists researchers from institutions like IBM, Stanford, Hebrew University, and Warwick University.

People (12)

Name Role Context
Kolmogorov Mathematician
Described as the Russian father of modern dynamical systems; proved Shannon metric entropy is a quantifiable invarian...
Ya Sinai Mathematician
Russian student/follower of Kolmogorov; SRB measure named partly after him.
David Ruelle Mathematician
Belgian Frenchman; SRB measure named partly after him.
Rufus Bowen Mathematician
American; SRB measure named partly after him.
Claude Shannon Scientist/Mathematician
Referenced regarding informational entropy and Shannon metric entropy.
Donald Ornstein Mathematician
Stanford University; won a Field's Medal for late 1960s work on Shannon metric entropy.
Roy Adler Mathematician
Affiliated with IBM in New York.
Brian Marcus Mathematician
Affiliated with IBM in California.
Benjamin Weiss Mathematician
Affiliated with Hebrew University.
William Parry Mathematician
Affiliated with Warwick University.
Peter Walters Mathematician
Affiliated with Warwick University.
Mark Pollicott Mathematician
Affiliated with Warwick University.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Stanford University University
Institution of Donald Ornstein.
IBM Company
Employer of Roy Adler and Brian Marcus.
Hebrew University University
Institution of Benjamin Weiss.
Warwick University University
Institution of William Parry, Peter Walters, and Mark Pollicott.
House Oversight Committee Government Body
Source of the document (implied by Bates stamp).

Timeline (2 events)

1956
Kolmogorov proved that the Shannon metric entropy is a quantifiable invariant of systems.
N/A
Late 1960s
Donald Ornstein's work proving Shannon metric entropy was the only invariant for a class of dynamical systems, winning him a Field's Medal.
Stanford University

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of Roy Adler (IBM).
Location of Brian Marcus (IBM).

Relationships (2)

Kolmogorov Mentor/Student Ya Sinai
Text refers to Sinai as one of 'Kolmogorov’s students and followers'.
Roy Adler Colleagues Brian Marcus
Both listed under IBM.

Key Quotes (2)

"It was the above noted Russian father of modern dynamical systems, Kolmogorov, who in 1956 proved that the Shannon metric entropy is a quantifiable invariant of systems even in very complicated motion."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013583.jpg
Quote #1
"Stanford University's Donald Ornstein won a Field’s Medal (the under forty year old mathematician’s Nobel Prize) for his late 1960’s work proving that the Shannon metric entropy, HM, was the only invariant for a large class of appropriately defined, expansive (near by points separating in time) dynamical systems."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013583.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,510 characters)

may partition the space of values taken by the journey of the orbital action generated by the equation over time with rectangular grids of increasing fineness. The result is an equipartition of phase space such that there is at most one orbital point in each rectangle of the grid, with, of course, many rectangles in the finer grids being empty. This final grid partition is called a generating partition. The proportion of the available boxes of the partition occupied by points is called its area or volume measure. This measure has been given a variety of names including Liouville, Haar and Lesbegue measures. If every box is occupied, it has measure one. If at most one box, it has measure zero. If we allow partitions to be non-uniform and/or not fine enough to be generating and apply probability weightings for how many points fall into each particular box of the grid, the method is called the Sinai-Ruelle-Bowen or SRB measure after Kolmogorov’s students and followers, the Russian, Ya Sinai, the Belgian Frenchmen, David Ruelle and the American, Rufus Bowen.
Similar to the SRB measure, the distribution of box occupancy probabilities multiplied by their logarithms and summed over all cells of the partition yields a statistical measure that is close to the informational entropy of Claude Shannon as described above. It is called the metric entropy ( HM = -Σ(pi ln(pi)), where H means entropy and pi is the proportion of the total observations that occupy cell i of the phase space or state space partition. It was the above noted Russian father of modern dynamical systems, Kolmogorov, who in 1956 proved that the Shannon metric entropy is a quantifiable invariant of systems even in very complicated motion. Stanford University's Donald Ornstein won a Field’s Medal (the under forty year old mathematician’s Nobel Prize) for his late 1960’s work proving that the Shannon metric entropy, HM, was the only invariant for a large class of appropriately defined, expansive (near by points separating in time) dynamical systems. Recall that we refer to metric entropy reflecting the relative occupancy as probability among the possible boxes (or states) as HM. HM is maximal when the percentage occupancy of all occupied boxes is uniform.
IBM’s Roy Adler in New York and Brian Marcus in California, Hebrew University’s Benjamin Weiss, Warwick University’s English mathematicians, William Parry, Peter Walters, Mark Pollicott and others developed and proved the relevance
83
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013583

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document