| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Larry Diamond
|
Affiliation |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Adam Beberg
|
Speaker host |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Adam Beberg
|
Lecturer host |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Tanya Luhrmann, Ph.D.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Tanya Luhrmann
|
Professional affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert E. Hall
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John Cogan
|
Affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
KLC OpCo
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A Working Group was jointly convened to produce a report on China's influence-seeking activities ... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | A Working Group was jointly convened to create a report on China's influence-seeking activities i... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A Working Group was jointly convened to study and report on China's influence-seeking activities. | Not specified | View |
This document is a partial curriculum vitae or list of professional engagements spanning from 2004 to 2007, detailing various lectures, conferences, and addresses given at universities and organizations across the US, Europe, and Mexico. It includes specific dates for events, participating organizations, and locations, highlighting a professional's involvement in psychological and legal fields.
This document is a list of professional activities and engagements, likely for an academic or legal professional, spanning from 1998 to 2000. It details various conferences, lectures, meetings, and academic affiliations across numerous universities, legal associations, and scientific organizations in the United States and internationally. The topics covered include memory, psychology, law, criminal defense, and wrongful convictions.
This document is a list of professional activities and speaking engagements from 1994 and 1995, likely from a CV. It details conferences, seminars, grand rounds, and workshops with their host organizations and locations across the US, Canada, Europe, and Asia. Key themes include psychology, law, trauma, memory, and sexual abuse.
This document is a list of academic institutions, legal associations, and other organizations, along with events, grouped by year from 1974 to 1980. It appears to be a chronological record of affiliations, seminars, and conferences, potentially related to a professional's career or an institution's activities. The document also includes page numbering and a document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00015246'.
This document is a section from a Curriculum Vitae, detailing academic honors, fellowships, research grants, and awards received by an individual from 1965 to 2019. It lists numerous affiliations with universities, government agencies, and scientific organizations, highlighting contributions to psychology, memory research, and public policy. The document also includes collaborators on various funded projects.
This document is the first page of the Curriculum Vitae for Elizabeth F. Loftus, a Distinguished Professor at UC Irvine. It outlines her education, teaching experience, and honorary degrees. The document is stamped as a Defendant's Exhibit (EL-1) for the case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), which corresponds to the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, indicating Loftus was utilized as an expert witness for the defense.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the direct examination of Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, who testifies about her educational background at UCLA and Stanford, establishing her credentials in mathematics and psychology. The questioning focuses on the definition and contents of her Curriculum Vitae (CV) to lay the foundation for further expert testimony.
This document contains two slides from a presentation titled 'USA Inc. | High Level Thoughts' produced by KPCB (Kleiner Perkins). The slides bear the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020864. The content is a financial analysis criticizing the historical underestimation of Medicare costs and highlighting concerns from Federal Reserve leaders (Bernanke and Volcker) regarding the sustainability of US entitlement program spending.
This document consists of two slides from a KPCB presentation titled 'USA Inc. | High Level Thoughts.' The first slide (p. 43) graphically depicts US Federal Spending as a percentage of GDP from 1795 to 2010, highlighting the growth of entitlement programs compared to war-time spending. The second slide (p. 44) compares US entitlement spending ($1.43 trillion) directly to India's entire nominal GDP for 2010, noting they are equal amounts.
This document is a biographical list titled 'About the Participants,' likely from a House Oversight Committee record (indicated by the footer HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020656). It details the professional titles and affiliations of twelve individuals, many of whom are prominent scholars, diplomats, or experts in Asian studies, China-US relations, and international security. A significant number of the participants are affiliated with Stanford University or major think tanks like the Hoover Institution and the Council on Foreign Relations.
This document, page 45 of a House Oversight report (Section 4), details the influx of over $426 million in Chinese funding to American universities since 2011 and the potential political influence associated with these donations. It outlines concerns regarding gifts from the Chinese government, specifically mentioning the Hanban, the Ministry of Culture, and the China-United States Exchange Foundation (CUSEF) founded by Tung Chee Hwa. The text argues for increased due diligence, noting that even private Chinese donors may act under the direction of the Chinese government.
This document appears to be page 31 of a manuscript or report discussing the existential risks of Artificial Intelligence. The text argues against common dismissals of AI danger (such as the ability to 'switch it off' or that it is 'impossible'), using historical analogies involving nuclear physics (Rutherford and Szilard) and hypothetical scenarios. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of evidence collected during a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's ties to the scientific community and academia.
The document is a biographical list of high-profile individuals from technology, media, finance, government, and military sectors. It appears to be an attendee list or briefing document for an event, detailing the current roles and backgrounds of figures such as General Stan McChrystal, Max Levchin, and Jorge Lemann. The document is marked with a House Oversight footer, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation.
This document is a biographical list of high-profile individuals from the technology, political, and academic sectors, possibly serving as a guest list for a conference or retreat (such as the Dialog Retreat mentioned in Auren Hoffman's bio). It includes the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017584', indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee investigation. Notably, the list includes a 'Jeff Epstein,' who is identified as the former CFO of Oracle, distinct from the financier Jeffrey Epstein typically associated with such investigations.
This document is a page from a booklet (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017560) featuring biographical profiles of Charity Tillemann Dick and Geoffrey West. It details Charity's career as an opera singer and her medical history involving two lung transplants, alongside Geoffrey West's academic career as a theoretical physicist and leader at the Santa Fe Institute. The document appears to be an attendee bio page for a conference or high-profile gathering (possibly an Edge dinner or similar intellectual summit frequently attended by Epstein associates).
This document is a biographical profile of Steven Pinker, designated with the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017554', indicating it is part of a larger cache of documents related to a House Oversight investigation (commonly associated with the Epstein investigation). The document outlines Pinker's academic history at McGill, Harvard, and MIT, his research in psychology and linguistics, his bibliography of published books up to 2011, and his awards. It concludes with personal details about his residence in Boston/Truro and his family members, including Rebecca Newberger Goldstein.
This document provides detailed biographical profiles of Mary Jordan, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist for the Washington Post, and Jon Kamen, the Chairman and CEO of the media company @radical.media. It outlines their career histories, notable works, awards, and affiliations.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) detailing the author's legal advocacy for Soviet Jews. It recounts the story of helping Michael Cernea (Moishe Katz) defect from Romania in the 1970s with the help of Senator Kennedy, and the long-term pro-bono representation of Natan Sharansky alongside Irwin Cotler. The text concludes with Sharansky's release across the Glinicke Bridge.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or legal analysis (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the style and context of these files) discussing the Supreme Court's *Bakke* decision regarding affirmative action. The text critiques Justice Powell's opinion for favoring Harvard's vague 'holistic' admissions process over Davis Medical School's specific quotas, calling the decision a 'triumph of ambiguity.' The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir by Alan Dershowitz, submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017221). It details Dershowitz's historical defense of a professor named Franklin at Stanford University, his collaboration with research assistant Joel Klein, and his public conflict with Stanford President Lyman regarding First Amendment rights. The text describes the Faculty Committee's decision to fire Franklin for urging students to occupy a computation center and Dershowitz's subsequent lecture criticizing the faculty's stance on civil liberties.
This document appears to be page 133 of a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the Bruce Franklin case) produced to the House Oversight Committee. The text discusses First Amendment principles, specifically the 'violence veto,' and recounts the narrator's legal representation of Stanford Professor Bruce Franklin in 1970. It details Franklin's speeches inciting students to shut down the Stanford Computation Center, the subsequent police intervention, and Franklin's eventual firing by University President Lyman.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or legal narrative, likely by Alan Dershowitz (referenced in the footnote), produced during House Oversight proceedings. The text recounts the author's legal work during the Vietnam War era, specifically his involvement in high-profile First Amendment and anti-war protest cases, including the defense of the Chicago 7 lawyer William Kunstler, Harvard students, and Stanford professor Bruce Franklin. It details the author's perspective on the conflict between national security and civil liberties during that period.
This document appears to be a page from a business report detailing the operations of KLC OpCo (likely Knowledge Learning Corporation) as of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. It outlines the company's business model, which includes 1,812 community centers and 122 employer-sponsored childcare centers. The document lists specific high-profile corporate and government clients, including the NSA, Lockheed Martin, and the World Bank Group, and details tuition structures and contract types.
This document appears to be page 30 of a book or report titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'. It discusses the science of intelligence (IQ), specifically referencing Lewis Terman's longitudinal study from the 1920s and the concept that high IQ does not guarantee life success or creativity. It cites examples of Nobel Prize winners who were excluded from high-IQ studies. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015720' stamp, indicating it is part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations involving scientific funding or connections.
This page appears to be a fragment of a satirical essay or speech regarding the '100th Monkey' New Age parable. The text humorously twists the concept by introducing physiological consequences (lack of roughage) and absurd elements like surplus TV sets, Ex-Lax sponsorships, and sign-language training at Stanford University. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it was part of an investigative production.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity