This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page ii) from a legal filing, likely a brief or motion. It lists various legal precedents (case law) primarily focused on media, public access to court records, and sealing orders (e.g., NY Times v. US, Globe Newspaper v. Superior Court). Crucially, it cites 'People v. Epstein' (2011) as a key authority used 'passim' (throughout) the main document, suggesting the filing relates to the legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein, possibly regarding the unsealing of records. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein | Defendant/Subject of Case Law |
Cited in 'People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (1st Dep’t 2011)' marked as 'passim' (appearing througho...
|
| Wiley | Legal Party |
Cited in 'Daily News, L.P. v. Wiley'
|
| Bell | Legal Party |
Cited in 'In re Associated Press v. Bell'
|
| Moynihan | Legal Party |
Cited in 'In re Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v. Moynihan'
|
| Weisenberg | Legal Party |
Cited in 'In re Herald Co. v. Weisenberg'
|
| Feifer | Legal Party |
Cited in 'Maxim, Inc. v. Feifer'
|
| Burton | Legal Party |
Cited in 'People v. Burton'
|
| Nixon | Legal Party (Historical) |
Cited in 'Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc.'
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. | ||
| FTC | ||
| Daily News, L.P. | ||
| Danco Labs., Ltd. | ||
| Chem. Works of Gideon Richter, Ltd. | ||
| Globe Newspaper Co. | ||
| National Broad. Co. | ||
| Associated Press | ||
| Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. | ||
| Herald Co. | ||
| Gabelli Grp. Capital Partners | ||
| Maxim, Inc. | ||
| N.Y. Times Co. | ||
| Warner Commc’ns, Inc. | ||
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016486'
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Multiple citations from N.Y. courts (e.g., 1st Dep't, 2d Dep't, 3d Dep't)
|
|
|
Court jurisdiction mentioned in Brown & Williamson case
|
|
|
Court jurisdiction mentioned in National Broad. Co. case
|
Complete text extracted from the document (2,404 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document