This document is the final page (page 5) of a legal filing submitted by David E. McCraw on June 25, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Citing legal precedents regarding public scrutiny and openness, McCraw requests the Court unseal the Defendant's Motion for a New Trial and the questionnaires of the twelve seated jurors. The filing also requests that future documents related to this motion be filed without sealing, except for redactions necessary to protect juror safety.
This document is page 14 of a legal brief or motion arguing for the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein's classification as a level three sex offender. The text draws a parallel to Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance's failure to prosecute Harvey Weinstein in 2015, arguing that the public has a right to scrutinize how the justice system handles 'rich and well-connected' sex offenders to ensure no impropriety or undue deference occurred. It cites legal precedents emphasizing that public access to court proceedings is essential for analyzing judicial reasoning and ensuring fairness.
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page ii) from a legal filing, likely a brief or motion. It lists various legal precedents (case law) primarily focused on media, public access to court records, and sealing orders (e.g., NY Times v. US, Globe Newspaper v. Superior Court). Crucially, it cites 'People v. Epstein' (2011) as a key authority used 'passim' (throughout) the main document, suggesting the filing relates to the legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein, possibly regarding the unsealing of records. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity