DOJ-OGR-00017957.jpg
538 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document (court transcript)
File Size:
538 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Dr. Rocchio, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. The questioning establishes that Dr. Rocchio has not personally published research or conducted metadata studies on the topic of "grooming." It also confirms his testimony relies on the work of other experts and that there is scientific disagreement within the field.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness |
Being cross-examined about his expertise and review of literature on the topic of grooming.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Conducting the cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company (Court Reporting Agency) |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript page as the transcribing agency.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Attorney Mr. Rohrbach cross-examines witness Dr. Rocchio in a legal proceeding.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (1)
Mr. Rohrbach, an attorney, is conducting a cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio, a witness, in a court proceeding. The nature of the questioning is to probe and potentially challenge the witness's expertise and testimony.
Key Quotes (4)
"You yourself have not published anything specifically about the topic of grooming, correct?"Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Questioning Dr. Rocchio about his personal contributions to the scientific literature on grooming.)
DOJ-OGR-00017957.jpg
Quote #1
"And you yourself have not conducted any metadata studies to collect and analyze literature about grooming, correct?"Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Further questioning Dr. Rocchio's direct research experience on the topic.)
DOJ-OGR-00017957.jpg
Quote #2
"So the studies that you were discussing with the jury are studies that are done by other people, correct?"Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Confirming that Dr. Rocchio's testimony is based on a review of others' work.)
DOJ-OGR-00017957.jpg
Quote #3
"You are aware that there is some disagreement in the scientific literature about the topic of grooming, correct?"Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Establishing that the field of study Dr. Rocchio is testifying about is not settled science.)
DOJ-OGR-00017957.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,308 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 84 of 228
LC2Qmax3
Rocchio - Cross
760
LC2Qmax3
Rocchio - Cross
760
1
CROSS-EXAMINATION
CROSS-EXAMINATION
2
BY MR. ROHRBACH:
BY MR. ROHRBACH:
3
Q. Good morning, Dr. Rocchio.
Q. Good morning, Dr. Rocchio.
4
A. Good morning.
A. Good morning.
5
Q. Dr. Rocchio, you talked a bit about your review of
Q. Dr. Rocchio, you talked a bit about your review of
6
literature in connection with the topics that you talked about
literature in connection with the topics that you talked about
7
today. Do you recall that testimony this morning?
today. Do you recall that testimony this morning?
8
A. I do.
A. I do.
9
Q. You yourself have not published anything specifically about
Q. You yourself have not published anything specifically about
10
the topic of grooming, correct?
the topic of grooming, correct?
11
A. No.
A. No.
12
Q. And you yourself have not conducted any metadata studies to
Q. And you yourself have not conducted any metadata studies to
13
collect and analyze literature about grooming, correct?
collect and analyze literature about grooming, correct?
14
A. Correct.
A. Correct.
15
Q. And a metadata study is a somewhat comprehensive review of
Q. And a metadata study is a somewhat comprehensive review of
16
the literature on the topic, analyzing that literature, and
the literature on the topic, analyzing that literature, and
17
then having a publication that deals with the metadata
then having a publication that deals with the metadata
18
analysis. Is that a fair summary of what that would be?
analysis. Is that a fair summary of what that would be?
19
A. A statistical analysis, yes.
A. A statistical analysis, yes.
20
Q. So the studies that you were discussing with the jury are
Q. So the studies that you were discussing with the jury are
21
studies that are done by other people, correct?
studies that are done by other people, correct?
22
A. Yes, experts in the field.
A. Yes, experts in the field.
23
Q. You are aware that there is some disagreement in the
Q. You are aware that there is some disagreement in the
24
scientific literature about the topic of grooming, correct?
scientific literature about the topic of grooming, correct?
25
A. About certain aspects of the topic, yes.
A. About certain aspects of the topic, yes.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017957
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document