Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
Attorney Mr. Rohrbach cross-examines witness Dr. Rocchio in a legal proceeding.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Rocchio | person | 187 | View Entity |
| MR. ROHRBACH | person | 523 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00017957.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Dr. Rocchio, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. The questioning establishes that Dr. Rocchio has not personally published research or conducted metadata studies on the topic of "grooming." It also confirms his testimony relies on the work of other experts and that there is scientific disagreement within the field.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
The Court called a 10-minute break in the proceedings.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
A legal argument took place regarding the definition of 'dominant purpose' for jury instructions in a case involving crossing state lines for criminal sexual conduct.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion between the Court and counsel regarding jury instructions, specifically concerning the interpretation of New Mexico law on illegal sexual activity and how evidence should be presented to the jury. The Court indicates it will consider the points raised and re-propose instructions.
2021-12-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Cross-examination of witness Ms. Chapell by attorney Mr. Everdell in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion in court regarding the testimony and evidence for Exhibit 52.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A court hearing where the admissibility of testimony from Mr. Grumbridge and Dr. Loftus is being discussed.
2022-08-10
Legal arguments are being made regarding a defendant's active participation in offenses, the sufficiency of proof at trial, and the potential application of a 'conscious avoidance theory' instruction to the jury, particularly concerning cases involving children.
2022-08-10 • court
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about his employment at Brown University, his title, responsibilities, and length of service, leading to the introduction of his curriculum vitae as Government Exhibit 1.
2025-01-15 • Court proceeding (location not specified)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event