DOJ-OGR-00009391.jpg

397 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal transcript
File Size: 397 KB
Summary

This document is a legal transcript from a deposition where the witness, Edelstein, is questioned about the discovery of information regarding Juror No. 1, Catherine M. Conrad. The questioning focuses on the timeline of when Edelstein's side learned from a Westlaw report that the juror was a suspended attorney, referencing an email sent within the firm, a letter received on June 20, and a court conference on July 15 involving Theresa Trzaskoma.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Edelstein Witness
The person being questioned throughout the transcript.
Catherine M. Conrad Juror No. 1 / suspended attorney
The subject of a Westlaw report, identified as Juror No. 1 and a suspended attorney.
Juror No. 1 Juror
Identified as Catherine M. Conrad, the subject of an inquiry.
Theresa Trzaskoma
Mentioned as a participant in a court conference on July 15.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Westlaw company
Mentioned as the source of a report about Catherine M. Conrad.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.

Timeline (3 events)

Someone looked at a Westlaw report concerning Catherine M. Conrad.
her (unidentified person)
A letter written in May was received on June 20.
July 15
A court conference was held.
court

Relationships (2)

Catherine M. Conrad personal Catherine M. Conrad's father
The questioner asks if the witness noticed the "same name for her father" in a personal injury report.
Edelstein professional Theresa Trzaskoma
The questioning implies they are colleagues or on the same legal team, as Edelstein reviewed a report before Trzaskoma participated in a court conference.

Key Quotes (1)

"Jesus, I think this is the one,"
Source
— somebody else in your firm (Quoted from an email sent after reviewing a Westlaw report, indicating a belief that Juror No. 1 was Catherine M. Conrad, the suspended attorney.)
DOJ-OGR-00009391.jpg
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,211 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 102 of 130
A-5787
C2GFDAU3
330
Edelstein
1 had subsequently looked at a Westlaw report that led her to
2 send an e-mail to somebody else in your firm saying, "Jesus, I
3 think this is the one," meaning Juror No. 1 was the Catherine
4 M. Conrad the suspended attorney? Did she tell that you?
5 A. No.
6 Q. Did you learn of the Westlaw report during the conversation
7 with her?
8 A. No.
9 Q. At what point did you learn about the Westlaw report
10 conversation?
11 A. I learned about the Westlaw report --
12 Q. I'm sorry the report?
13 A. After we received the letter and jury verdict.
14 Q. Before the July --
15 A. By the letter I mean the letter that was written in May and
16 received on June 20.
17 Q. Did you review the Westlaw report before Theresa Trzaskoma
18 participated in the court conference on July 15?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. Did you yourself notice the similarities between the
21 address for Catherine M. Conrad, Juror No. 1, the existence of
22 a personal injury report, same name for her father? Did you
23 note those things?
24 A. When --
25 Q. Did you note those things?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009391

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document