EFTA00014128.pdf

64.4 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread
File Size: 64.4 KB
Summary

An email thread from December 2008 between attorney Katherine Ezell and an Assistant U.S. Attorney concerning Jeffrey Epstein's work release. Ezell inquires whether providing victim addresses to be programmed as 'off-limits' on Epstein's GPS device would inadvertently reveal those locations to him. The AUSA confirms that address information will not be disclosed to Epstein and details that the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office (PBSO) monitors his programmed travel routes.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Katherine W. Ezell Attorney
Sender of the initial inquiry and final acknowledgment; likely representing victims.
Amy Ederi Attorney/Associate
Cc'd on the emails; addressed alongside Kathy.
Jeffrey Epstein Subject
referred to as 'JE'; subject of work release and GPS monitoring discussion.
[Redacted] (USAFLS) Assistant U.S. Attorney
Respondent; handling communications regarding Epstein's work release conditions.
[Redacted] Unknown (Likely Law Enforcement/Supervisor)
Person the AUSA spoke with regarding the technical/privacy details of the GPS monitoring.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
USAFLS
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (implied by acronym).
PBSO
Palm Beach Sheriff's Office; monitoring Epstein's GPS routes.

Timeline (1 events)

2008-12-29
Email discussion regarding the privacy mechanics of Jeffrey Epstein's GPS monitoring during work release.
West Palm Beach, FL (implied context)
Katherine W. Ezell Amy Ederi Assistant U.S. Attorney

Locations (2)

Location Context
Address of the Assistant U.S. Attorney.
Location Epstein travels from.

Relationships (2)

Katherine W. Ezell Colleagues Amy Ederi
Both addressed together ('Hi Kathy and Amy') and copied on correspondence.
Jeffrey Epstein Monitored Subject PBSO
PBSO has his travel routes programmed in to his GPS monitor

Key Quotes (4)

"Epstein is accompanied only by his private driver when he goes to and from the jail"
Source
EFTA00014128.pdf
Quote #1
"PBSO has his travel routes programmed in to his GPS monitor so, if he deviates from that route, they will know if they check the monitor when he returns."
Source
EFTA00014128.pdf
Quote #2
"He said that if you provide the address info, it will not be disclosed to Epstein or his people."
Source
EFTA00014128.pdf
Quote #3
"First, if he is only going to and from that office address, why does he need to be mechanically otherwise restricted?"
Source
EFTA00014128.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,125 characters)

From: "KATHERINE W. EZELL" <[REDACTED]>
To: "[REDACTED]. (USAFLS)" <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE:
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:11:12 +0000
Importance: Normal
Thanks, [REDACTED].
From: [REDACTED]. (USAFLS) [mailto:[REDACTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 5:05 PM
To: KATHERINE W. EZELL
Cc: Amy Ederi
Subject: RE:
Hi Kathy and Amy – I hope all is well with you. I see from the paper that you are in a firestorm of your own
right now.
I just spoke with [REDACTED] He said that if you provide the address info, it will not be disclosed to Epstein
or his people. Epstein is accompanied only by his private driver when he goes to and from the jail, although
PBSO has his travel routes programmed in to his GPS monitor so, if he deviates from that route, they will know
if they check the monitor when he returns.
[REDACTED] has asked that all requests go through me so he knows who is legit and who isn't, so if anyone
wants their addres(es) added, please let me know. I am going to send an e-mail to all of the plaintiffs’ attorneys
with this info.
[REDACTED]
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone [REDACTED]
Fax [REDACTED]
From: KATHERINE W. EZELL [mailto:[REDACTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 1:44 PM
To: [REDACTED]. (USAFLS)
Cc: Amy Ederi
Subject:
Dear [REDACTED], This is a message I tried to send on the 20th. I got a notification back that it did not go through, so I’m trying
this different address.
In your notification letter about JE’s work release that you wrote to the victims you mentioned the possibility of their
notifying you if they wanted any of their addresses made off limits on his mechanical device that restricts him. First, if he is
only going to and from that office address, why does he need to be mechanically otherwise restricted? Second, should one
of the victims want to designate an address where she lives or works to be programmed as off limits, is it possible for him
to then have access to the name of the victim and the specific location from which he is being restricted?
Wishing you a peaceful and happy holiday! Kathy
EFTA00014128

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document