This document is a motion filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys requesting an extension until December 15, 2009, to respond to a complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 102. The reasons cited for the extension include ongoing resolution negotiations and questions arising from the 'implosion' of the Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, PA firm.
An email chain from June 2010 involving the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS). The core of the document is a forwarded list of 17 pointed questions from an inquirer asking why Jeffrey Epstein received such lenient treatment, why federal trafficking charges were dropped, why Ghislaine Maxwell was not charged, and questioning the involvement of the US Attorney General (USAG) in stopping the investigation. Internal commentary from the USAFLS notes they likely cannot answer the questions.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach regarding press contact from an individual named Sarnoff. Sarnoff claims to be producing a documentary and book about Jeffrey Epstein using a modeling agency to traffic underage girls into the US. The email notes that the FBI had previously attempted to interview Sarnoff's source without success and that Sarnoff is currently dissatisfied with the FBI's requirement that the source come forward to be interviewed.
This document is an email dated July 14, 2008, sent by an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach regarding the Epstein case. The sender asks colleagues if they should extend the term of the Grand Jury (set to expire in two weeks) as a precaution in case the plea agreement unravels due to recent developments.
An email chain from November 24, 2008, involving the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) and Roy Black, Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney. Ann Marie Villafana sent a letter to Roy Black, and a subsequent internal email (with redacted participants) asks, 'Wow --- have you heard anything back?', suggesting anticipation regarding Black's response to the attached letter.
An email thread from December 2008 between attorney Katherine Ezell and an Assistant U.S. Attorney concerning Jeffrey Epstein's work release. Ezell inquires whether providing victim addresses to be programmed as 'off-limits' on Epstein's GPS device would inadvertently reveal those locations to him. The AUSA confirms that address information will not be disclosed to Epstein and details that the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office (PBSO) monitors his programmed travel routes.
An email exchange from July 30, 2008, between attorney Roy Black and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS). The AUSA requested a discussion regarding the 'Epstein matter,' to which Roy Black replied that he was out of town and asked for details on the topic.
This document is an email chain from June 24-25, 2008, involving Assistant U.S. Attorneys and defense lawyers Roy Black and Jack Goldberger. The correspondence confirms the Government's stance that a binding plea agreement with Jeffrey Epstein is signed and requires no modification, while internal emails discuss a '2255 issue' and the upcoming Change of Plea (COP).
This document is an email chain from July 30, 2008, between Assistant U.S. Attorneys (USAFLS) and Roy Black. The correspondence concerns scheduling a discussion regarding the 'Epstein matter,' specifically relating to the 'performance of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.' Roy Black indicates he is out of town and inquires about the subject matter, prompting internal deliberation among the prosecutors on how to respond.
This document is an email thread between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) from June 27-28, 2008. The correspondence concerns a 'Notice of Non-Compliance' and negotiations regarding the wording of Epstein's plea agreement, specifically the insertion of the word 'imprisoned' regarding his six-month sentence. The emails confirm a telephone conference where it was agreed that the state plea agreement complied with the federal non-prosecution agreement.
This document is an email thread from July 2008 between attorney Ted Leopold and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) regarding the 'Epstein Investigation.' The AUSA provides contact details and thanks Leopold for assistance. Leopold replies, copying attorney Spencer Kuvin, stating he will provide 'the names' the following day and asks Kuvin to meet with him.
This document contains an email chain between FBI agents and the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) in July 2008 regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses names found in 'message pads' that were not fully identified and expresses a belief that more victims will come forward following Epstein's conviction. It also includes an exchange with attorney Ted Leopold, who provides the names of two clients relevant to the investigation.
This document contains a chain of emails from June and July 2008 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) and attorney Ted Leopold (cc'ing Spencer Kuvin). The correspondence involves the 'Epstein Investigation.' Ted Leopold provides the names of two clients (redacted) to the U.S. Attorney's office. The internal government emails discuss checking these names and attempting to contact the mother of a redacted individual.
This document is an email chain from June 30, 2008, between Ted Leopold and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) in West Palm Beach regarding the 'Epstein Investigation.' The correspondence involves the exchange of contact information and includes a personal note from Leopold asking the AUSA to say hello to two mutual friends (names redacted).
Email exchange between Epstein's defense attorney Roy Black and an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the confidentiality of the September 24, 2007 (Non-Prosecution) agreement. Black thanks the AUSA for agreeing to oppose the disclosure of this agreement in civil cases, fearing it would be publicized to attract more plaintiffs. The AUSA requests a copy of the sealed state court filing from co-counsel Jack Goldberger to ensure consistency in documents.
A legal motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 08-8068-LRJ) requesting to seal a search warrant application. The motion, submitted under U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, cites an ongoing grand jury investigation and the risk that public disclosure would jeopardize the case or notify targets. The specific Assistant U.S. Attorney's identity and contact details are redacted.
This document is a Sealed Document Tracking Form filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on August 31, 2007. It relates to a motion by the United States to file documents under seal concerning Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 and OLY-64 (Case Number FGJ 07-103). The filing requests that the documents remain sealed until case closing and subsequently be returned to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
This document is an email chain between Assistant U.S. Attorneys dated November 20, 2008, reacting with surprise and anger to the news that Jeffrey Epstein was granted work release. The prosecutors discuss how Epstein's lawyers (Goldberger and Roy) had previously assured them this would not happen. The emails allege that the 'Florida Science Foundation' exists solely to employ Epstein, allowing him to spend his days at his lawyer's office rather than in confinement.
An email chain from November 25, 2008, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney and an FBI agent regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release case file. The officials discuss surveillance of Epstein's home, noting the presence of specific vehicles, and express concern that Epstein might attempt to flee ('run') in the coming days. They also mention monitoring for any information about planes leaving.
An email exchange between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) regarding a meeting concerning Jeffrey Epstein. The AUSA asks if Lefkowitz will attend a meeting on Thursday with 'Roy' (likely Roy Black). Lefkowitz responds on December 3, 2008, stating he does not plan to attend.
An email chain from December 2008 between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach. They discuss an upcoming meeting involving 'Roy' which Lefkowitz states he will not attend, and arrange a phone call.
This document contains an email thread from December 29, 2008, between the FBI and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS), and a forwarded email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to several lawyers representing victims (Josefsberg, Edwards, Ezell, etc.). The primary subject is the confidentiality of victim locations regarding Jeffrey Epstein's GPS monitoring 'exclusionary zones.' The Assistant U.S. Attorney confirms, via Captain Sleeth of the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office, that victim addresses added to the GPS system will remain confidential and will not be shared with Epstein.
This document is an email chain from December 2008 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney and several defense attorneys (Josefsberg, Ezell, Edwards, etc.) regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release conditions. The discussion focuses on the 'exclusionary zones' programmed into Epstein's GPS monitoring system to protect victims. The AUSA confirms, via Captain Sleeth of the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office, that while Epstein's GPS will alert if he nears a prohibited location, the specific addresses and identities of the victims will remain confidential and unknown to Epstein.
This document is an internal email chain within the USAFLS (U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida) dated August 15, 2008. An employee inquires about the status of 'Operation Leap Year' for caseload certification purposes. An Assistant U.S. Attorney responds that the operation remains technically open 'in case he breaches' (referring to the subject's plea/non-prosecution agreement) but should be considered 'on hold.'
This document is an email chain from September 2008 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) and Elizabeth Clark Tarbert, Ethics Counsel (likely for the Florida Bar). The AUSA is requesting a written staff opinion regarding 'Final Victim Notification,' attaching sample notification documents. Tarbert acknowledges the request and notes a 3-5 week turnaround time for a reply.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity