DOJ-OGR-00001928.jpg

631 KB

Extraction Summary

8
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 631 KB
Summary

This document is page 51 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 10, 2020. The text captures an oral argument by the defense counsel advocating for the defendant's release on bail by citing various legal precedents (Esposito, Madoff, Dreier, Deutsch, Conway, and Mattis). The argument highlights that defendants in cases involving organized crime, massive financial fraud, sex crimes, and even violence (Molotov cocktail) were previously granted bail under strict conditions.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Defendant Accused
Subject of the bail hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330 implies Ghislaine Maxwell)
Judge Marrero Judge
Presided over the Esposito case cited as precedent
Esposito Defendant in precedent case
Cited as a case where an organized crime member was released on bail
Madoff Defendant in precedent case
Bernie Madoff; cited as a financial fraud case where bail was granted
Dreier Defendant in precedent case
Marc Dreier; cited as a financial fraud case where bail was granted
Deutsch Defendant in precedent case
Case involving sex crime allegations where release was awarded
Conway Defendant in precedent case
Case from Northern District of CA involving sex crimes where release was awarded
Mattis Defendant in precedent case
United States v. Mattis; cited regarding dangerousness and bail

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Transcription service provider
Second Circuit
Appellate court jurisdiction mentioned regarding U.S. v. Mattis
Eastern District
Court jurisdiction (likely EDNY) mentioned regarding the Deutsch case
Northern District of California
Court jurisdiction mentioned regarding the Conway case

Timeline (3 events)

2019
Esposito case hearing
Court
2020-12-10
Bail hearing arguments
Court (presumed SDNY based on case number)
Defense Counsel The Court
Unknown
Molotov cocktail incident
Police car
Two attorneys (Mattis case)

Locations (2)

Location Context
Jurisdiction location for Deutsch case
Jurisdiction location for Conway case

Relationships (2)

Defendant Legal Comparison Madoff
Defense compares current defendant's situation to Madoff regarding bail eligibility.
Defendant Legal Comparison Esposito
Defense compares current defendant to Esposito (organized crime figure) regarding bail.

Key Quotes (3)

"But all of those cases, as well as Madoff and Dreier... in all of those cases, the courts held that bail should be set subject to strict conditions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001928.jpg
Quote #1
"There are also cases from the context involving pornography or sex crime allegations... the decision was made that release could be awarded on conditions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001928.jpg
Quote #2
"that is the case where the allegation is that two attorneys threw a Molotov cocktail into a police car; challenge to bail"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001928.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,755 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 51 of 91 51
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 arrest. That defendant was released on bail conditions, strict
2 bail conditions.
3 And I mention Esposito, which is the 2019 case from
4 Judge Marrero, that is a case in which the allegation was that
5 the defendant was a senior ranking member of organized crime
6 and had access to financial means as well.
7 But all of those cases, as well as Madoff and Dreier,
8 which I'm sure the court is familiar, with involved allegations
9 of defendants with hundreds of millions of dollars, in all of
10 those cases, the courts held that bail should be set subject to
11 strict conditions. And by the way, Judge, in all of those
12 cases, the defendants appeared for court. They all made
13 appearances and appeared for trial.
14 There are also cases from the context involving
15 pornography or sex crime allegations, such as the Deutsch case
16 coming from the Eastern District several years ago, the Conway
17 case in the Northern District of California. Again,
18 understanding those are the allegations, the decision was made
19 that release could be awarded on conditions.
20 You even had one recently in the Second Circuit that
21 I'm sure everyone is familiar with United States v. Mattis,
22 different setting, because that was a dangerousness case and
23 the government is not proceeding on dangerousness grounds, but
24 that is the case where the allegation is that two attorneys
25 threw a Molotov cocktail into a police car; challenge to bail
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001928

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document