DOJ-OGR-00008335.jpg
582 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
582 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on December 10, 2021. In the transcript, the judge discusses the disclosure of expert witness opinions with defense counsel, Ms. Menninger and Mr. Rohrbach. The judge agrees to a deadline of the upcoming Saturday for the defense to provide these opinions and reminds them of their obligation under Rule 16 to provide a clear notice of the opinions, stating that it is not a "scavenger hunt."
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the case, questioning counsel about deadlines and disclosure requirements for an expert witness.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Counsel |
Speaking on behalf of her client, discussing the disclosure of expert opinions and proposing a deadline.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Counsel |
Also speaking on behalf of the defense, adding context about materials their expert would review.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
| the government | government agency |
Mentioned in the context of "the government's exhibits" in the case.
|
Timeline (3 events)
A court hearing took place where the disclosure of expert witness opinions was discussed.
Courtroom
A deadline was set for the defense to provide the opinions of their expert witness.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (3)
Both are speaking on behalf of the defense, discussing their shared expert witness, indicating they are co-counsel.
The Court is presiding over the legal proceeding in which Ms. Menninger is acting as counsel.
The Court is presiding over the legal proceeding in which Mr. Rohrbach is acting as counsel.
Key Quotes (3)
"This Saturday, your Honor?"Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Proposing a deadline to the Court for providing expert opinions.)
DOJ-OGR-00008335.jpg
Quote #1
"That sounds very reasonable to me. OK?"Source
— THE COURT
(Agreeing to the proposed deadline of Saturday for the disclosure of expert opinions.)
DOJ-OGR-00008335.jpg
Quote #2
"It's not a scavenger hunt. You're required, as the first matter, to provide, pursuant to Rule 16, the opinions that he's going to offer."Source
— THE COURT
(Instructing counsel on their legal obligation to explicitly state their expert's opinions rather than making the opposing side search for them in other materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00008335.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,467 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 536 Filed 12/10/21 Page 25 of 43 25
LBNAMAXTps
LBNAMAXTps
1 that are not disclosed, I will raise that with the Court at
2 that time.
3 THE COURT: All right.
4 Just with respect to what you have as anticipated
5 opinion about those subjects, when will you -- give me the date
6 by which you'll tell me if your expert has different expert
7 opinions to offer with respect to those areas.
8 MS. MENNINGER: This Saturday, your Honor?
9 THE COURT: All right.
10 MS. MENNINGER: And I don't -- I guess what I'm
11 hearing is, the only opinions he may offer are those disclosed
12 in other cases. They haven't disclosed an opinion from this
13 case. So we will look at those other trial testimony, and any
14 opinions in those testimony that our client -- our expert
15 disagrees with we can provide them by this Saturday.
16 THE COURT: That sounds very reasonable to me. OK?
17 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor. Although we know
18 that, again, in addition to the other -- his testimony in other
19 cases, we would point the defense expert to the 3500 material
20 as well in this case and the government's exhibits.
21 THE COURT: Well, I mean, your notice should provide
22 the opinions that he's going to offer. Does it?
23 It's not a scavenger hunt. You're required, as the
24 first matter, to provide, pursuant to Rule 16, the opinions
25 that he's going to offer. Have you done that?
2 that time.
3 THE COURT: All right.
4 Just with respect to what you have as anticipated
5 opinion about those subjects, when will you -- give me the date
6 by which you'll tell me if your expert has different expert
7 opinions to offer with respect to those areas.
8 MS. MENNINGER: This Saturday, your Honor?
9 THE COURT: All right.
10 MS. MENNINGER: And I don't -- I guess what I'm
11 hearing is, the only opinions he may offer are those disclosed
12 in other cases. They haven't disclosed an opinion from this
13 case. So we will look at those other trial testimony, and any
14 opinions in those testimony that our client -- our expert
15 disagrees with we can provide them by this Saturday.
16 THE COURT: That sounds very reasonable to me. OK?
17 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor. Although we know
18 that, again, in addition to the other -- his testimony in other
19 cases, we would point the defense expert to the 3500 material
20 as well in this case and the government's exhibits.
21 THE COURT: Well, I mean, your notice should provide
22 the opinions that he's going to offer. Does it?
23 It's not a scavenger hunt. You're required, as the
24 first matter, to provide, pursuant to Rule 16, the opinions
25 that he's going to offer. Have you done that?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00008335
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document