Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A deadline was set for the defense to provide the opinions of their expert witness.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR. ROHRBACH | person | 523 | View Entity |
| MS. MENNINGER | person | 1436 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00008335.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on December 10, 2021. In the transcript, the judge discusses the disclosure of expert witness opinions with defense counsel, Ms. Menninger and Mr. Rohrbach. The judge agrees to a deadline of the upcoming Saturday for the defense to provide these opinions and reminds them of their obligation under Rule 16 to provide a clear notice of the opinions, stating that it is not a "scavenger hunt."
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript.
Date unknown • Not specified
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A witness, Meder, is questioned about a photograph showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The photograph, sourced from a CD (1B63) from the Epstein and Maxwell investigation, is admitted into evidence as Plaintiff's Exhibit 342.
2022-08-10 • Court
A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
Cross-examination of witness Jane by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding redactions and public release of evidence.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
The Court called a 10-minute break in the proceedings.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
A legal argument during a court proceeding regarding the admissibility of photographs found in Mr. Epstein's home.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion took place regarding the procedural rules for the length and scope of the closing and rebuttal arguments.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
A legal argument took place regarding the definition of 'dominant purpose' for jury instructions in a case involving crossing state lines for criminal sexual conduct.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event