DOJ-OGR-00013982.jpg

610 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (testimony)
File Size: 610 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus), who is explaining the scientific stages of memory: acquisition, retention, and retrieval. The witness describes how 'acts of retrieval,' such as conversations or police interviews, occur during the retention interval after an event.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Loftus Witness / Expert
Testifying on direct examination regarding memory science (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus).
Unidentified Attorney Interviewer
Conducting direct examination (Q.) of the witness.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice, indicated in the bates stamp (DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Filing date of the transcript document.
Southern District of New York
Unknown (Date of testimony)
Direct examination of expert witness Loftus regarding the stages of memory (acquisition, retention, retrieval).
Courtroom
Loftus Attorney

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction implied by the case number and court reporter location.

Key Quotes (3)

"So there can be a long retention interval peppered with different acts of retrieval."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013982.jpg
Quote #1
"I used a simple diagram here to illustrate the three major stages."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013982.jpg
Quote #2
"That would be a standard situation in a legally relevant event."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013982.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,672 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 123 of 246 2418
LCGCmax4 Loftus - direct
1 sometimes they're witnesses, and they're not the victim
2 themselves, but --
3 Q. Now, after the acquisition stage, is anything that happens
4 after the event, whichever constitutes the event occurs,
5 considered retention stage?
6 A. Typically, yes. It's after the event is over, so we say,
7 well, that's the retention stage. I don't mean to complicate
8 things too much, but I think you can appreciate that actually
9 there can be many acts of retrieval. So there can be a long
10 retention interval peppered with different acts of retrieval.
11 But I used a simple diagram here to illustrate the three major
12 stages.
13 Q. Can you simply identify what separate acts of retrieval
14 would be.
15 A. So after some event, say, you know, a robbery, sometimes
16 people might have a conversation with each other about what
17 they saw and then sometimes the police might come to the scene
18 and start asking questions about what did you see or what did
19 you hear, and then the person might go to a police station and
20 maybe try to make an identification of somebody who might have
21 been seen at the event, and then somebody may be interviewed
22 many more times, may then testify at trial. That would be a
23 standard situation in a legally relevant event.
24 Q. Now, in each of those retrieval examples you just gave,
25 that is coming from an external source; correct?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013982

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document