DOJ-OGR-00013558.jpg
552 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
552 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022. The judge and attorneys for the government and defense discuss the scheduling of future trial events, such as the charge conference and closing arguments, which depends on when the defense will rest its case. A defense attorney, Ms. Comey, also brings up an unresolved issue regarding a subpoena issued to a Mr. Glassman.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, discussing scheduling with the court and government.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the case and discussing scheduling.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, acknowledging the court's statement.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, representing the government and stating they have no preference on scheduling.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, representing the defense and raising an issue about a subpoena.
|
| Mr. Glassman |
Mentioned as the subject of an outstanding subpoena raised by the defense.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the case, being updated on scheduling and asked for its preference.
|
| Court | government agency |
The judicial body presiding over the case, being updated on scheduling.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-08-10
A court hearing took place where scheduling for the remainder of a trial was discussed.
Court
Discussion of a potential charge conference to be held on a Thursday night if the defense rests before Friday.
Court
Discussion of getting to closing arguments before the following Monday.
Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (4)
MS. STERNHEIM is an attorney addressing the judge (THE COURT) in a formal court proceeding.
MR. ROHRBACH speaks on behalf of the government, stating its position on scheduling.
MS. COMEY speaks in connection with the defense case, raising an issue on its behalf.
MS. COMEY, representing the defense, raises the issue of an outstanding subpoena directed to Mr. Glassman.
Key Quotes (3)
"So I think if there's a chance that the defense either won't put on a case or would rest before Friday, then we should do the charge conference Thursday night."Source
— THE COURT
(Proposing a schedule for the charge conference based on the defense's timeline.)
DOJ-OGR-00013558.jpg
Quote #1
"The government has no preference. That makes sense to us."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Responding to the court's question about scheduling preferences on behalf of the government.)
DOJ-OGR-00013558.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, in connection with the defense case, I do think there's still the outstanding issue of the subpoena to Mr. Glassman."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Raising an unresolved legal matter concerning a subpoena during the scheduling discussion.)
DOJ-OGR-00013558.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,370 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 17 of 49 1990
LC9VMAXI
LC9VMAXI
1 that -- and, as I said, I wanted to have agreement from both
2 sides on it. But the reason not to do that would be if we
3 might get to closings before the following Monday. And that's
4 why it's really -- because if we will get to closings before
5 the following Monday, the charge needs to be done before then.
6 MS. STERNHEIM: Of course. And we will update the
7 government and the Court with regard to scheduling.
8 THE COURT: Okay.
9 So I think if there's a chance that the defense either
10 won't put on a case or would rest before Friday, then we should
11 do the charge conference Thursday night. So that's the
12 question.
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood, your Honor.
14 THE COURT: Okay.
15 Does the government have any preference or views on
16 that?
17 MR. ROHRBACH: The government has no preference. That
18 makes sense to us. Thank you, your Honor.
19 THE COURT: Okay. Great. Yes.
20 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, in connection with the defense
21 case, I do think there's still the outstanding issue of the
22 subpoena to Mr. Glassman.
23 THE COURT: Yes. I was looking at that last night as
24 well. And I have a question and a little bit of a proposal,
25 see if we can get back to a magical moment. It's a difficult
2 sides on it. But the reason not to do that would be if we
3 might get to closings before the following Monday. And that's
4 why it's really -- because if we will get to closings before
5 the following Monday, the charge needs to be done before then.
6 MS. STERNHEIM: Of course. And we will update the
7 government and the Court with regard to scheduling.
8 THE COURT: Okay.
9 So I think if there's a chance that the defense either
10 won't put on a case or would rest before Friday, then we should
11 do the charge conference Thursday night. So that's the
12 question.
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood, your Honor.
14 THE COURT: Okay.
15 Does the government have any preference or views on
16 that?
17 MR. ROHRBACH: The government has no preference. That
18 makes sense to us. Thank you, your Honor.
19 THE COURT: Okay. Great. Yes.
20 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, in connection with the defense
21 case, I do think there's still the outstanding issue of the
22 subpoena to Mr. Glassman.
23 THE COURT: Yes. I was looking at that last night as
24 well. And I have a question and a little bit of a proposal,
25 see if we can get back to a magical moment. It's a difficult
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013558
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document