EFTA00025193.pdf
57.6 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
57.6 KB
Summary
An email chain from February 23, 2021, among Assistant United States Attorneys for the Southern District of New York. The team is coordinating the drafting and review of a legal brief opposing a motion based on a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filename 'GM_Government_Opposition' strongly indicates this relates to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails discuss refining arguments, with the initial drafter expressing concern about the strength of the second half of the brief, followed by positive feedback from colleagues.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Redacted Sender (Initial Email) | Assistant United States Attorney |
Drafted the NPA brief and requested review from colleagues; expressed struggle with the second half of the arguments.
|
| Redacted Reviewers | Government Attorneys (SDNY) |
Colleagues reviewing the brief, providing comments, and coordinating a chat.
|
| GM (Ghislaine Maxwell) | Defendant (Implied) |
referenced in filename 'GM_Government_Opposition' and as 'her' in the text regarding the motion to be denied.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York (SDNY) |
Office of the Assistant United States Attorney sending the email.
|
|
| US Department of Justice |
Implied by 'Assistant United States Attorney'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-02-23
Drafting and review of Government Opposition to NPA motion (likely regarding Ghislaine Maxwell).
New York
SDNY Assistant US Attorneys
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the sender.
|
Relationships (1)
Redacted AUSA
→
Professional/Legal Team
→
Redacted Colleagues
Email chain coordinating legal strategy and document review within the SDNY office.
Key Quotes (3)
"I think we’re in great shape too – we have a lot of convincing reasons her motion should be denied."Source
EFTA00025193.pdf
Quote #1
"Attached is the most recent draft of the NPA brief. Apologies for the delay, I really struggled with this one."Source
EFTA00025193.pdf
Quote #2
"I think our arguments in the first half are strong, but I’m really not wild about the second half."Source
EFTA00025193.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,655 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: NPA
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:13:50 +0000
Attachments: 2021-02-26_GM_Government_Opposition_(NPA)_(MC)_(AR)_(LP).docx
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: NPA
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:13:50 +0000
Attachments: 2021-02-26_GM_Government_Opposition_(NPA)_(MC)_(AR)_(LP).docx
My comments layered on top in the attached. I think this is very strong and well written.
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:05 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: NPA
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:05 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: NPA
Hi all,
My comments attached. I think we’re in great shape too – we have a lot of convincing reasons her motion should be denied.
I’m around to discuss anytime.
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:54 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: NPA
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:54 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: NPA
Thanks for the close read – can the three of us chat after [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] have also reviewed? Thanks.
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:46 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: NPA
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:46 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: NPA
Thanks very much, [REDACTED]. I think this is in great shape and is very compelling. Some small edits and my responses to your comments attached. Happy to jump on a call if that would be useful.
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:02 AM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: NPA
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:02 AM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: NPA
All,
[PAGE 2 START]
Attached is the most recent draft of the NPA brief. Apologies for the delay, I really struggled with this one. I think our arguments in the first half are strong, but I’m really not wild about the second half. Would very much appreciate your comments/edits. I’ve also flagged a few issues for consideration/discussion. If you’re able to review tomorrow morning, that would be great.
Attached is the most recent draft of the NPA brief. Apologies for the delay, I really struggled with this one. I think our arguments in the first half are strong, but I’m really not wild about the second half. Would very much appreciate your comments/edits. I’ve also flagged a few issues for consideration/discussion. If you’re able to review tomorrow morning, that would be great.
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
EFTA00025194
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document