An email chain from April 2020 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The attorney asks colleagues if they are facing pressure from leadership ('the chiefs'), specifically citing 'near-daily prodding' regarding the Epstein case deadlines, which the attorney feels are unreasonable given the 'circumstances of the world' (likely referring to the COVID-19 pandemic). A colleague replies comparing the situation to their own work on cases involving AMI.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Redacted Sender (Bottom Email) | Assistant U.S. Attorney |
Sent an email to colleagues complaining about management pressure regarding the Epstein case.
|
| Redacted Sender (Top Email) | Prosecutor/Attorney (implied) |
Replied to the thread mentioning their own cases involving 'AMI'.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Investigation |
Mentioned as 'the Epstein case' which is causing the AUSA significant work pressure and daily prodding.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York (SDNY) |
Employer of the email sender (Assistant U.S. Attorney).
|
|
| AMI |
Likely American Media Inc.; mentioned in the reply email regarding a different case context.
|
|
| The Chiefs / The Brass |
Leadership within the US Attorney's office applying pressure for memos.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the Assistant U.S. Attorney.
|
"I'm just curious whether it's just the Epstein case (where we're getting near-daily prodding about imminent deadlines for memos that are both extremely time-intensive and also couldn't possibly be acted upon for weeks, given the circumstances of the world)"Source
"I just sent the chiefs a pretty crabby email about being bugged daily about lengthy, detailed work product"Source
"They're pretty hands on when it comes to [REDACTED] et al, but nothing like you're describing (or [REDACTED] has seemingly experienced with AMI)."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,250 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document