EFTA00015282.pdf

35.6 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 35.6 KB
Summary

An email chain from April 2020 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The attorney asks colleagues if they are facing pressure from leadership ('the chiefs'), specifically citing 'near-daily prodding' regarding the Epstein case deadlines, which the attorney feels are unreasonable given the 'circumstances of the world' (likely referring to the COVID-19 pandemic). A colleague replies comparing the situation to their own work on cases involving AMI.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Redacted Sender (Bottom Email) Assistant U.S. Attorney
Sent an email to colleagues complaining about management pressure regarding the Epstein case.
Redacted Sender (Top Email) Prosecutor/Attorney (implied)
Replied to the thread mentioning their own cases involving 'AMI'.
Jeffrey Epstein Subject of Investigation
Mentioned as 'the Epstein case' which is causing the AUSA significant work pressure and daily prodding.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District of New York (SDNY)
Employer of the email sender (Assistant U.S. Attorney).
AMI
Likely American Media Inc.; mentioned in the reply email regarding a different case context.
The Chiefs / The Brass
Leadership within the US Attorney's office applying pressure for memos.

Timeline (1 events)

2020-04-09
Assistant U.S. Attorney sends a 'crabby email' to chiefs regarding daily pressure and deadlines on the Epstein case.
Southern District of New York
Assistant U.S. Attorney

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the Assistant U.S. Attorney.

Relationships (1)

Assistant U.S. Attorney (Redacted) Prosecutor/Investigator Jeffrey Epstein (Case)
Sender refers to working on 'the Epstein case' and dealing with deadlines for it.

Key Quotes (3)

"I'm just curious whether it's just the Epstein case (where we're getting near-daily prodding about imminent deadlines for memos that are both extremely time-intensive and also couldn't possibly be acted upon for weeks, given the circumstances of the world)"
Source
EFTA00015282.pdf
Quote #1
"I just sent the chiefs a pretty crabby email about being bugged daily about lengthy, detailed work product"
Source
EFTA00015282.pdf
Quote #2
"They're pretty hands on when it comes to [REDACTED] et al, but nothing like you're describing (or [REDACTED] has seemingly experienced with AMI)."
Source
EFTA00015282.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,250 characters)

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: out of curiosity
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 14:26:06 +0000
Nothing really to report for my cases. They're pretty hands on when it comes to [REDACTED] et al, but nothing like you're describing (or [REDACTED] has seemingly experienced with AMI).
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 10:12 AM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: out of curiosity
To the extent anybody in this small group is willing to share, are any of you folks' teams / cases getting significant pressure from the chiefs on memos or other written product this week, whether for the brass or otherwise? I'm just curious whether it's just the Epstein case (where we're getting near-daily prodding about imminent deadlines for memos that are both extremely time-intensive and also couldn't possibly be acted upon for weeks, given the circumstances of the world) or if it's something broader in the unit. I just sent the chiefs a pretty crabby email about being bugged daily about lengthy, detailed work product and it made me wonder whether this is a trend or an isolated incident.
More importantly, hope y'all and families are all staying healthy . . .
[REDACTED]
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
EFTA00015282

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document