HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.jpg

2.05 MB

Extraction Summary

8
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email
File Size: 2.05 MB
Summary

An email from Moshe Hoffman to Jeffrey Epstein dated May 3, 2016. Hoffman thanks Epstein for a previous meeting and for introducing him to 'Brockman' and 'Ehud,' noting that he hopes a book will result from these interactions. At the suggestion of 'Martin,' Hoffman outlines three major social science questions regarding the origins of moral/political views, the origin of tastes (referencing evolutionary psychology and young women), and the origin of political/economic institutions.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Moshe Hoffman Sender
Research scientist/academic sending questions to Epstein; mentions working on a book.
Jeffrey Epstein Recipient
Addressed as 'Jeff' and 'jeffrey E.'; email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'; facilitated introductions.
Martin Associate
Suggested Moshe send the questions to Epstein; likely Martin Nowak given the academic context.
Brockman Associate
Epstein introduced Moshe to him; likely John Brockman.
Ehud Associate
Epstein introduced Moshe to him; likely Ehud Barak.
Donald Trump Politician
Mentioned in context of political supporters (Trump vs. Bernie).
Bernie Sanders Politician
Mentioned as 'Bernie' in context of political supporters.
Jesus Religious Figure
Mentioned in the context of beliefs ('Jesus loves you').

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
ISIS
Mentioned in comparison to the U.S. regarding cultural moral differences.

Timeline (1 events)

Prior to 2016-05-03
Meeting between Moshe Hoffman and Jeffrey Epstein where introductions to Brockman and Ehud were made.
Unknown (text says 'last time you were in town')

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in comparison to ISIS regarding cultural moral differences.

Relationships (4)

Moshe Hoffman Professional/Academic Jeffrey Epstein
Hoffman thanks Epstein for introductions and sends intellectual questions.
Jeffrey Epstein Associate Brockman
Epstein introduced Hoffman to Brockman.
Jeffrey Epstein Associate Ehud
Epstein introduced Hoffman to Ehud.
Martin Associate Jeffrey Epstein
Martin is aware of Epstein's intellectual interests and advises Hoffman to contact him.

Key Quotes (4)

"Thanks again for making the time for me last time you were in town. And for your introductions to Brockman and Ehud."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.jpg
Quote #1
"Martin mentioned that you are thinking about the top questions in various fields and suggested I might think of some of my own and pass them on to you."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.jpg
Quote #2
"The bull shit answers most people accept clearly don't fit the facts"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.jpg
Quote #3
"E.g., we evolved to like young curvy women because they are the most fertile."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,884 characters)

From: Moshe Hoffman [Redacted]
Sent: 5/3/2016 4:51:28 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)
Importance: High
Hi Jeff,
Thanks again for making the time for me last time you were in town. And for your introductions to Brockman
and Ehud. I have enjoyed all the conversations and been learning a lot. Hopefully, a book or two will come out
of it eventually as well. Means a lot to me.
Martin mentioned that you are thinking about the top questions in various fields and suggested I might think of
some of my own and pass them on to you.
In case you are interested, I list below the five biggest questions that keep me up at night, motivate my life's
work, and which I think ought to keep up every social scientist. Happy to discuss with you, if and when you are
interested.
-Moshe
----
1) Where do our moral and political views come from?
The bull shit answers most people accept clearly don't fit the facts; we are not discovering moral truths through
reason, and our political views are not motivated by a desire to achieve the best policy outcomes. So what does
drive these beliefs? And what causes them to have the weird puzzling features they do (e.g., why is a lie of
commission so much worse than a lie of omission)? And what causes them to change over time (e.g., slavery
has been accepted as moral at many points in history)? And differ across cultures (e.g., ISIS versus the U.S.)?
And across person and context (e.g., Trump vs. Bernie supporters)?
More generally, we believe and argue all sorts of crap (your vote can make a difference, Jesus loves you, all
men are created equal). How do these beliefs and arguments work? Are they just random ideas propagated by
an amorphous culture, viruses taking advantage of our own psychology for their benefit, ideas that get us to do
the bidding of their cynical designers?
2) Similarly, where do our tastes come from? Like the art we like? Or the music?
Some tastes are kinda obvious. E.g., we evolved to like young curvy women because they are the most fertile.
And maybe we like art that reminds us of this or of landscapes that are safe or what not. But there are many
aspects of art and music (e.g. modern art, rap) that are not universally pleasing. So what makes people like these
things? What properties do they need to succeed? What role does the artist or the history of the piece play in
what we like? Of course, this question isn't just about art and music, but about all of our peculiar, culturally
specific tastes. How does culture shape our tastes? Is it completely arbitrary or is there some logic to its
influence?
3) Where do our political and economic institutions come from and what causes them to have the peculiar
structure they have?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document