U.S.
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Merkel
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
1 |
Jeffrey Epstein Part 02 of 08.pdf
This document collection details the FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for child prostitution between late 2006 and early 2007. It includes internal FBI communications requesting travel to interview witnesses in New York, New Jersey, New Mexico, and the US Virgin Islands, as well as indications of coordination with the Palm Beach Police Department. The file also contains financial request forms for investigative expenses and notes the creation of link analysis charts (i2 Analyst Notebook) to track the case data.
Epstein_Part_02.pdf
This document contains a collection of FBI internal memos, electronic communications, and administrative forms related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein under Case ID 31E-MM-108062, covering late 2006 to early 2007. The files detail requests for travel concurrence to interview witnesses in various locations, the assignment of agents, the creation of analyst charts, and financial requests for expenses and search fees. A significant portion of the document consists of Deleted Page Information Sheets listing hundreds of pages withheld under FOIA exemptions.
2022.03.17%20%20Notice%20-%20Notice%20to%20the%20Court.pdf
This document is an opposition brief filed by the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands against the Epstein Estate's request for over $112,000 in attorneys' fees. The Government argues that the Estate is not a 'prevailing party' because the underlying court orders were not final judgments, and that the requested hourly rates (up to $1,315/hr) are excessive compared to the local standard of $350/hr. The filing also references the Government's broader CICO lawsuit alleging Epstein used his VI businesses to transport and abuse victims on Little St. James Island.
2022.03.04-3%20Exhibit%202.pdf
This document is 'Exhibit 2' filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands on March 4, 2022, in case ST-2021-RV-00005. The content is a Wall Street Journal article from February 9, 2016, titled 'Legal Fees Cross New Mark: $1,500 an Hour'. The article discusses the rising billing rates of top corporate lawyers in the US, citing specific firms like DLA Piper, Proskauer Rose, and Kirkland & Ellis. It serves as evidence of market rates for legal services, likely submitted to support a fee application in the associated court case.
2021.03.29%20Response%20-%20Response.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) on March 29, 2021, opposing the US Virgin Islands Government's appeal regarding their failed motion to intervene in probate proceedings. The executors argue the Government's petition is untimely as the original motion was denied over a year prior, and that the Government's emergency motion regarding estate assets is moot because the estate has replenished the Victims' Compensation Program funds. Attached exhibits include the original 2020 opposition brief and a March 2021 press release confirming the sale of Epstein's NYC and Palm Beach properties to fund the compensation program.
026.pdf
This document is the formal Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) in response to a civil complaint by Annie Farmer. The executors generally deny knowledge of the specific allegations of abuse but admit to certain procedural facts, such as Epstein's arrest date (July 6, 2019), death date (August 10, 2019), and property ownership in NY, NM, USVI, FL, and France. They assert ten affirmative defenses, including failure to state a claim, contributory negligence, assumption of risk, and statute of limitations arguments challenging the New York Child Victims' Act.
016.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Gregory H. Woods, dated January 21, 2020. It outlines the grounds for an anticipated motion to dismiss claims brought by plaintiff Teala Davies against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues that Davies' claims of sexual assault (alleged to have occurred between 2002 and 2004 in FL, NM, NY, USVI, and France) are time-barred by applicable statutes of limitations and that punitive damages cannot be recovered from a deceased tortfeasor's estate.
EFTA00037905.pdf
This document is a page from a federal questionnaire filled out by a victim witness. The respondent details being trafficked to Jeffery Epstein, being raped by him multiple times, and being trafficked by him to other men. The witness describes threats made by Epstein to harm other children and mentions his claim of having video cameras to record acts. The document references federal statutes regarding human trafficking (18 US 1591).
EFTA00028444.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2019, between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Virgin Islands (USVI). They are coordinating the logistics for a search warrant application for Jeffrey Epstein's property on Great St. James island. The emails reveal that the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service had recently conducted surveillance (flyover) of the island and could assist, and that the New York Times had contacted USA Gretchen Shappert and was sending a reporter to the region.
EFTA00026608.pdf
An email dated May 22, 2020, sent to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The sender inquires about the process of sponsoring a T-Visa (typically for victims of human trafficking) for a female individual whose current work visa and passport are set to expire in August 2020. The individual's attorneys initiated the inquiry.
EFTA00022059.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 7, 2020, sent by the U.S. DOJ Attaché in London to the SDNY team, confirming that a Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) request regarding Prince Andrew ('Material Witness PA') was officially delivered to the UK Central Authority. The email details the logistical challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, notes that the prosecution had unsuccessfully sought a voluntary interview for months, and outlines the UK legal process, including potential assignment to the London Metropolitan Police and the possibility of a 'Judicial Review' if the witness resists.
EFTA00021720.pdf
This document contains a series of emails from January 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the DOJ Attaché at the US Embassy in Paris. They discuss the ongoing French investigation into Jean-Luc Brunel, who was in custody at the time. Key topics include the French authorities' request for evidence from the Epstein investigation (specifically photos and database records using facial recognition), the drafting of Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) requests, and the French judiciary's insistence on reciprocity before sharing their own evidence with the US. The emails also mention the existence of photos of Brunel within seized Epstein evidence and the potential cooperation of two adult victims abused in Paris.
EFTA00019471.pdf
This document is an email chain from August and September 2019 involving the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the case 'US v. Epstein'. The correspondence discusses the technical processing of evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan residence, specifically loading data extracted from hard drives into the Relativity platform for privilege review. It clarifies that the data in question originated from the Manhattan search warrant returns and explicitly excludes materials seized from the US Virgin Islands.
EFTA00018159.pdf
This document contains an email chain between the U.S. Attorney's Office (Virgin Islands and SDNY) and the U.S. Marshal Service regarding an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for violating International Megan's Law (IML). The USMS Senior Inspector reports that Epstein signed a duty to report travel form on March 15, 2019, but subsequently failed to report two international trips: one to Vienna, Austria on March 22, 2019 (accompanied by three female passengers), and one to Morocco on April 25, 2019. The officials express concern that leaking this information could hamper the ongoing investigation given Epstein's resources.
EFTA00015712.pdf
An email exchange dated July 23, 2019, discussing a New York Times article about Jeffrey Epstein moving money overseas via Deutsche Bank transactions flagged to the U.S. authorities. The sender confirms that their 'Team was already on it' and notes that 'McFadden' (likely a journalist) has discussed the matter in an interview.
EFTA00005832.pdf
The document contains an investigative file folder with handwritten notes regarding a subject living in Astoria, NY. It includes notes from an interview dated July 31, 2019, detailing the subject's timeline involving Brazil, San Diego, and NYC between 2001 and 2005. Also included is a printout from the eJusticeNY Integrated Justice Portal regarding a DMV photo request for the subject dated June 6, 2019. The majority of the file (12 pages) is completely redacted.
EFTA00003557.pdf
A color photograph (marked with evidence stamp EFTA00003557) depicting Jeffrey Epstein and a man identified as Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem sitting at an outdoor table. The setting features tropical landscaping, a stone building, and a blue and white striped umbrella, consistent with the Little St. James property. The two men appear to be conversing, with Sulayem gesturing towards the background.
EFTA00002941.pdf
This document is a photograph depicting the distinctive blue and white striped cubic building (often referred to as the 'temple') located on Little St. James island. The image shows the structure's exterior, including large wooden doors, surrounding palm trees, a white terrace, and red and white stripes painted on the ground. The only text present is an evidence file number in the bottom right corner.
EFTA00001739.pdf
This document is a photograph showing the exterior of a building, likely a residence on Jeffrey Epstein's Little St. James property. The image depicts a covered patio area with distinct stone walls, white structural arches, and large grid-patterned glass doors or windows. The only text present is the evidence identification number 'EFTA00001739' in the bottom right corner.
DOJ-OGR-00001456.jpg
This legal document, dated May 27, 2021, addresses post-conviction bail proceedings concerning 'Maxwell.' It clarifies that an Order regarding security checks at the MDC is not a bail determination and that Maxwell's 'renewed motion' for bail is substantively meritless. The document affirms Judge Nathan's prior findings that Maxwell is a risk of flight and that no bail conditions could reasonably assure her appearance in court.
DOJ-OGR-00001190.jpg
This document outlines a preliminary statement arguing for the release of Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell on strict bail conditions. It highlights her substantial bail package, including a bond signed by her spouse and support from seven sureties, while contesting the government's opposition as being based on her association with Jeffrey Epstein rather than legal standards.
DOJ-OGR-00001123.jpg
This document, a page from a legal filing dated August 25, 2020, argues that Ghislaine Maxwell has received an unprecedented amount of media attention since her arrest in July 2020. It presents a bar chart comparing the number of U.S. media articles about her in the 90 days post-arrest to those of other high-profile defendants like Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, Joaquín Guzmán Loera, and Keith Raniere, demonstrating her coverage was greater than all the others combined.
DOJ-OGR-00016225.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between counsel (Ms. Moe) and the judge. Ms. Moe successfully argues for the admission of evidence related to a person's date of birth to prove they were not underage during the 2000s, which the judge deems relevant for rebuttal. The judge then proposes a sidebar with the parties to discuss jury matters.
DOJ-OGR-00002211(1).jpg
This document is a preliminary statement arguing for the release of Ghislaine Maxwell on bail, detailing a proposed bond package secured by her and her spouse's net worth and backed by seven additional sureties. The defense argues that Maxwell is being held to an unfair standard due to her association with Jeffrey Epstein and contends that the government's evidence is weaker than represented.
DOJ-OGR-00022033.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed on behalf of defendant Michael Thomas, requesting the court to authorize the disclosure of investigative and disciplinary records from the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The defense seeks information about a similar incident in 2005 or 2006, where officers received lenient punishment, arguing this is relevant to Mr. Thomas's state of mind ('mens rea') for the charges he faces related to an incident on August 10, 2019.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity