HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014108.jpg

1.3 MB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document (defendant's response to request for production)
File Size: 1.3 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing filed on March 24, 2015, in the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM). It contains the Defendant's responses to specific requests for production of documents. The requests seek evidence supporting the Defendant's assertions that attorney Paul G. Cassell acted unethically, corruptly, or in a 'sleazy' manner, and failed to investigate allegations made by Jane Doe #3.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Jane Doe #3 Victim/Accuser
Mentioned in relation to allegations that were allegedly not investigated before being referenced in a legal filing.
Paul G. Cassell Attorney/Subject of Inquiry
The document requests evidence supporting negative assertions about his character, ethics, and professional conduct (...
Defendant Respondent
The party responding to the legal requests, agreeing to produce documents subject to objections.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
FLSD
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (indicated in header)
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014108'

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court (FLSD)

Relationships (2)

Defendant Adversarial/Legal Paul G. Cassell
The request implies the Defendant has made assertions that Cassell is 'sleazy', 'unethical', and 'corrupt'.
Mention implies Cassell may have referred to allegations by Jane Doe #3 in a legal filing.

Key Quotes (4)

"failed to conduct any investigation of the allegations of Jane Doe #3 relating to you before referring to those allegations in a legal filing."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014108.jpg
Quote #1
"Copies of any and all documents tending to support your assertion that Paul G. Cassell: a. has a reputation of being sleazy"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014108.jpg
Quote #2
"has engaged in any form of conduct warranting the loss of his license to practice law"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014108.jpg
Quote #3
"Defendant responds that he will produce all responsive, non-privileged documents currently in his possession, custody or control."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014108.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,447 characters)

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 25 of 34
i. failed to conduct any investigation of the allegations of Jane Doe #3 relating to you before referring to those allegations in a legal filing.
RESPONSE:
Subject to and without waiving the General Objections, Defendant responds that he will produce all responsive, non-privileged documents currently in his possession, custody or control.
21. Copies of any and all documents tending to support your assertion that Paul G. Cassell:
a. has a reputation of being sleazy;
b. has acted in a sleazy manner;
c. has engaged in unethical conduct;
d. has knowingly relied upon false statements in any legal document filed by him;
e. has engaged in any form of unethical conduct;
f. has engaged in any form of conduct tending to demonstrate a lack of fitness to engage in the practice of law;
g. has engaged in any form of conduct warranting the loss of his license to practice law or the imposition of any professional disciplinary action against him;
h. has acted in a corrupt manner;
i. failed to conduct any investigation of the allegations of Jane Doe #3 relating to you before referring to those allegations in a legal filing.
RESPONSE:
Subject to and without waiving the General Objections, Defendant responds that he will produce all responsive, non-privileged documents currently in his possession, custody or control.
10
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014108

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document