This document is a page from a legal filing filed on March 24, 2015, in the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM). It contains the Defendant's responses to specific requests for production of documents. The requests seek evidence supporting the Defendant's assertions that attorney Paul G. Cassell acted unethically, corruptly, or in a 'sleazy' manner, and failed to investigate allegations made by Jane Doe #3.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe #3 | Victim/Accuser |
Mentioned in relation to allegations that were allegedly not investigated before being referenced in a legal filing.
|
| Paul G. Cassell | Attorney/Subject of Inquiry |
The document requests evidence supporting negative assertions about his character, ethics, and professional conduct (...
|
| Defendant | Respondent |
The party responding to the legal requests, agreeing to produce documents subject to objections.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FLSD |
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (indicated in header)
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014108'
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court (FLSD)
|
"failed to conduct any investigation of the allegations of Jane Doe #3 relating to you before referring to those allegations in a legal filing."Source
"Copies of any and all documents tending to support your assertion that Paul G. Cassell: a. has a reputation of being sleazy"Source
"has engaged in any form of conduct warranting the loss of his license to practice law"Source
"Defendant responds that he will produce all responsive, non-privileged documents currently in his possession, custody or control."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,447 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document