DOJ-OGR-00009694.jpg

597 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 597 KB
Summary

This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. The filing argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct. The primary focus is on "Juror No. 50," who allegedly was untruthful during voir dire and subsequently gave media interviews; it also mentions a second juror who disclosed during deliberations that they were a victim of sexual assault.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Juror No. 50 Juror
Mentioned throughout the table of contents as the subject of alleged misconduct, including their questionnaire, voir ...
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned as the individual whose constitutional right to a fair trial was allegedly deprived by Juror No. 50's misco...
A second juror Juror
Mentioned for admitting to disclosing during deliberations that they were a victim of sexual assault.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
The Independent Media Company
Mentioned as a media outlet that conducted an interview with Juror No. 50.
Daily Mail Media Company
Mentioned as a media outlet that conducted an interview and a partial video interview with Juror No. 50.
Reuters Media Company
Mentioned as a media outlet that conducted an interview with Juror No. 50.
Court Judicial Body
Mentioned in the context of Juror No. 50's admissions that he wasn't truthful with it.

Timeline (3 events)

Jury Selection process, including the jury questionnaire and voir dire.
Jury deliberations during which a second juror disclosed being a victim of sexual assault.
Juror No. 50 gave statements to the media, including interviews with The Independent, Daily Mail, and Reuters.

Relationships (2)

Juror No. 50 Legal (Juror-Defendant) Ms. Maxwell
The document alleges that Juror No. 50's misconduct deprived Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional right to a fair trial.
Juror No. 50 Legal Court
The document outlines Juror No. 50's admissions that he was not truthful with the Court during the jury selection process.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,151 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 2 of 66
Table of Contents
Table of Contents.................................................................................................................................. ii
Table of Authorities........................................................................................................................... iv
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1
Factual Background............................................................................................................................ 2
I. Jury Selection. .......................................................................................................................... 2
A. The jury questionnaire. ..................................................................................................... 2
B. Juror No. 50’s questionnaire.............................................................................................. 5
C. Juror No. 50’s voir dire...................................................................................................... 6
D. The final composition of the jury...................................................................................... 9
II. Juror No. 50’s admissions that he wasn’t truthful with the Court......................................... 11
A. Juror No. 50’s statements to the media........................................................................... 12
1. The interview with the Independent. ........................................................................ 12
2. The interview with the Daily Mail. .......................................................................... 13
3. The interview with Reuters........................................................................................ 14
4. The partial video of the interview with the Daily Mail.............................................. 14
B. Juror No. 50’s social media activity. .............................................................................. 15
C. A second juror admits to disclosing during deliberations that they were a victim of
sexual assault. ................................................................................................................. 21
Applicable Law................................................................................................................................. 21
I. Juror No. 50’s misconduct deprived Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional right to a fair
trial by an impartial jury. .......................................................................................................... 21
A. A party alleging unfairness based on undisclosed juror bias must demonstrate first,
that the juror’s voir dire response was false and second, that the correct response
would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause. ........................................ 21
ii
DOJ-OGR-00009694

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document