This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The witness testifies about speaking to the media regarding their experiences with Maxwell and Epstein, confirming interviews with the FBI in 2006/2007 and with reporters in 2016 and 2019, for which they were not paid. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects to a question about the witness's difficulty in speaking publicly, but the objection is overruled by the court.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| A. Farmer | Witness |
The individual being questioned under direct examination, answering questions about their experiences and subsequent ...
|
| Maxwell |
Mentioned in a question regarding the witness's experiences with 'Maxwell and Epstein'.
|
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in a question regarding the witness's experiences with 'Maxwell and Epstein'.
|
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
An attorney who makes an objection to a question posed to the witness.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge who overrules Ms. Menninger's objection.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI | government agency |
Mentioned in a question about whether the witness spoke with them in late 2006 or early 2007.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
"In the years after you spoke with FBI in late 2006 or early 2007, have you spoken with the media about your experiences with Maxwell and Epstein?"Source
"I believe -- well, I first spoke with another reporter, I think, in maybe 2016 off the record. And then later on the record in the summer of 2019. And I think then in the -- yeah, and then later into the fall."Source
"Objection. Relevance, your Honor."Source
"Overruled."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,293 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document