This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, detailing a discussion about a defendant's pretrial detention. The judge questions the prosecutor, Ms. Moe, about legal arguments raised by the defense attorney, Mr. Cohen, concerning the burden of proof for flight risk. Ms. Moe argues that the defendant has the burden to rebut the presumption of detention and has failed to do so, justifying the government's request to keep her detained.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (presumably for the government) |
Speaker in the transcript, responding to the court's questions about the defendant's detention.
|
| Mr. Cohen | Attorney (presumably for the defendant) |
Mentioned by the court as having made arguments about the standards and burdens for detention.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, questioning Ms. Moe on legal matters. Referred to as 'your Honor'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Pretrial Services | government agency |
Mentioned as having made a recommendation consistent with the government's request to detain the defendant.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| the government | government agency |
Referred to as the party urging the court to detain the defendant and arguing its legal position through Ms. Moe.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
"Briefly, Ms. Moe, just a couple of legal questions."Source
"Mr. Cohen argued that you failed to address directly the standards, the burdens under the statutory provision, and that you have avoided the fact of the government continuing to carry the burden by a preponderance of the evidence with respect to risk of flight..."Source
"Your Honor, the government submits that the standard is clear. It is the defendant's burden of production to rebut the presumption that there are no set of conditions that could reasonably assure her continued appearance in this case."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,645 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document