DOJ-OGR-00009805.jpg
587 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal brief (post-trial motion response)
File Size:
587 KB
Summary
This document is page 7 of a court filing (Document 643) from March 11, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details the voir dire responses of five specific jurors (63, 93, 113, 189, 239) who answered 'Question 48' affirmatively regarding past sexual abuse or harassment but were deemed impartial and not challenged for cause by either the prosecution or defense. The document highlights that despite personal histories of abuse, these jurors affirmed their ability to remain fair during the trial.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 63 | Juror |
Answered Question 48 affirmatively; stated she could be fair and impartial; not challenged for cause.
|
| Juror 93 | Juror |
Disclosed childhood sexual molestation by an uncle; stated it would not affect impartiality; not challenged for cause.
|
| Juror 113 | Juror |
Disclosed experiencing sexual harassment; stated he could be fair and impartial; not challenged for cause.
|
| Juror 189 | Juror |
Answered affirmatively regarding past experiences; reiterated ability to be fair during voir dire.
|
| Juror 239 | Juror |
Answered Question 48 affirmatively; reiterated ability to be fair during voir dire; not challenged for cause.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government |
Prosecution team in the case (United States).
|
|
| Defense Counsel |
Legal team for the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by footer DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (3 events)
Key Quotes (4)
"Juror 93 said that she was sexually molested by an uncle when she was 12 or 13, as was her sister and an aunt"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009805.jpg
Quote #1
"Juror 113 indicated that he had experienced sexual harassment, along with 'pretty much every woman I know'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009805.jpg
Quote #2
"Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 93 for cause."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009805.jpg
Quote #3
"In sum, there were eight jurors who were ultimately qualified who had answered Question 48 affirmatively."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009805.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,182 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 643 Filed 03/11/22 Page 7 of 49
[REDACTED BLOCK]
• Juror 63 also answered Question 48 in the affirmative and said her experience would not affect her ability to be fair and impartial. [REDACTED BLOCK] She indicated several times during voir dire that she could be fair and impartial in the case. See, e.g., id. at 216:19-217:2. Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 63 for cause.
• Juror 93 wrote that [REDACTED BLOCK]. During voir dire, in response to questioning, Juror 93 said that she was sexually molested by an uncle when she was 12 or 13, as was her sister and an aunt, but that would not affect her ability to be fair and impartial in the case and that the allegations in the case would not upset her in a way that would distract from her duty as a juror. Id. at 259:4-13. Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 93 for cause.
• Juror 113 indicated that he had experienced sexual harassment, along with “pretty much every woman I know,” but that would not affect his ability to be fair and impartial. During voir dire, Juror 113 stated that he did not believe his experience would make it difficult for him to serve as a juror and that he could be fair and impartial. Id. at 293:10-20. Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 113 for cause.
• Juror 189 wrote about [REDACTED BLOCK]. She indicated that it would not affect her ability to be fair and impartial. During voir dire, Juror 189 reiterated that her experiences would not interfere in any way with her ability to be fair and impartial. Nov. 17, 2021 Tr. at 532:13-18.
[REDACTED BLOCK]
• Juror 239 wrote in response to Question 48 of the juror questionnaire [REDACTED BLOCK]. During voir dire, Juror 239 reiterated that her experience would not interfere in any way with her ability to be fair to both sides. Nov. 18, 2021 Tr. at 635:2-8. Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 239 for cause.
In sum, there were eight jurors who were ultimately qualified who had answered Question 48 affirmatively. Each confirmed that he or she could be fair and impartial. Defense counsel
5
DOJ-OGR-00009805
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document