Juror 189
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Juror 50
|
Comparative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-17 | Voir dire | Voir dire inquiry of Juror 189. | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-17 | N/A | Voir Dire proceedings (Jury Selection) | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-17 | N/A | Voir dire examination of Juror 189 | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009157.jpg
This document is page 38 of a legal filing from February 24, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It argues against the defendant's claim that Juror 50's questionnaire responses prevented proper voir dire, comparing the situation to Jurors 189 and 239, who also answered 'yes' to Question 48 (regarding sexual abuse) but were qualified without objection after brief questioning. The filing asserts that the record disproves the defense's theory that they were deprived of the opportunity to examine Juror 50's views.
DOJ-OGR-00009895.jpg
This document is page 26 of a legal filing from March 11, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that the Court must conduct a broad inquiry into Juror No. 50's potential bias and intent, asserting that the juror has a history of giving false answers. It contrasts Juror No. 50 with Jurors 189 and 239, who properly disclosed details of past sexual abuse in written questionnaires, though the specific details of that abuse are redacted in this document.
DOJ-OGR-00009836.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against the defendant's claim that the court improperly handled the voir dire of Juror 50. It provides transcripts from the voir dire of two other jurors, Juror 189 and Juror 239, as examples of the standard procedure used by the court to assess impartiality. The document asserts that these examples demonstrate the court's process was sufficient and that the defendant's claim is contradicted by the record.
DOJ-OGR-00009805.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court filing (Document 643) from March 11, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details the voir dire responses of five specific jurors (63, 93, 113, 189, 239) who answered 'Question 48' affirmatively regarding past sexual abuse or harassment but were deemed impartial and not challenged for cause by either the prosecution or defense. The document highlights that despite personal histories of abuse, these jurors affirmed their ability to remain fair during the trial.
Voir Dire questioning
Reiterated experiences would not interfere with ability to be fair.
Voir Dire Questioning
Inquiry about ability to be fair and impartial despite questionnaire response.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity