DOJ-OGR-00001011.jpg

577 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 577 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, concerning Case 21-770. It details a discussion between the Judge, Ms. Moe (Government), and Mr. Cohen regarding the necessity of conducting the arraignment and bail hearing remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Court affirms that the proceeding cannot be delayed as the detained defendant is seeking bail and notes the significant public interest in the case.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Government Counsel/Prosecutor
Speaking on behalf of the government regarding remote proceedings.
Mr. Cohen Defense Counsel
Agreeing to proceed remotely on behalf of the defendant.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the arraignment and bail hearing.
Defendant Defendant
Currently detained and seeking release on bail (unnamed in this specific page text, though historically associated wi...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Government
Represented by Ms. Moe.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Transcription service listed in footer.

Timeline (1 events)

2021-04-01
Arraignment, scheduling conference, and bail hearing
Remote Proceeding (Southern District)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the reporter's name (likely SDNY).

Relationships (2)

Ms. Moe Legal Representation The Government
Ms. Moe speaks on behalf of 'The government'.
Mr. Cohen Legal Representation Defendant
Implied by his role as opposing counsel responding to the court regarding proceedings for the defendant.

Key Quotes (4)

"today's proceeding cannot be further delayed without serious harms to the interests of justice."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001011.jpg
Quote #1
"The government submits that proceeding remotely in this fashion would protect the interests of the parties and the safety in view of the pandemic."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001011.jpg
Quote #2
"the defendant, who is currently detained, seeks release on bail."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001011.jpg
Quote #3
"The final preliminary matter I will address is public access to the proceeding, which has garnered significant public interest."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001011.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,556 characters)

Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page70 of 200
7 k7e2MaxC kjc
1 arraignment, scheduling conference, and bail hearing.
2 Counsel, as you know, to proceed remotely today, in
3 addition to the finding I have just made, I must also find that
4 today's proceeding cannot be further delayed without serious
5 harms to the interests of justice.
6 Ms. Moe, does the government wish to be heard on that?
7
8 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
9 The government submits that proceeding remotely in
10 this fashion would protect the interests of the parties and the
11 safety in view of the pandemic. We further submit that this
12 proceeding can be conducted remotely with full participation of
13 the parties in view of the preparation and steps everyone has
14 taken to ensure proper participation.
15 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.
16 Mr. Cohen?
17 MR. COHEN: Your Honor, we have agreed to proceed
18 remotely as your Honor just laid out.
19 THE COURT: Okay. I do find that today's proceeding
20 cannot be further delayed without serious harms to the
21 interests of justice for, among other reasons, that the
22 defendant, who is currently detained, seeks release on bail.
23 The final preliminary matter I will address is public
24 access to the proceeding, which has garnered significant public
25 interest. As I have indicated in prior orders, the court has
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001011

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document