DOJ-OGR-00017924.jpg
410 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (trial proceedings)
File Size:
410 KB
Summary
This document is page 51 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It depicts the direct examination of expert witness Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding whether a 'groomer' is always the recipient of sexual gratification. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to the questioning, the objection is sustained by the Court, and Ms. Pomerantz subsequently requests a sidebar conference.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness / Expert |
Being questioned on direct examination regarding the psychology of grooming and sexual gratification.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney (likely Prosecution) |
Conducting the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney (likely Defense) |
Raising objections to Ms. Pomerantz's line of questioning.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the session, ruling on objections, and granting a sidebar.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Implied by footer 'DOJ-OGR-00017924'
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Courtroom
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case context.
|
|
|
Where the testimony is taking place.
|
Relationships (2)
Pomerantz questions Rocchio during direct examination.
Pagliuca objects to Pomerantz's questions.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (864 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 51 of 228 727
LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct
LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct
1 (In open court)
2 THE COURT: You may proceed.
3 No, I'm sorry. I sustain the objection.
4 Next question.
5 BY MS. POMERANTZ:
6 Q. Dr. Rocchio, based on your experience, research, and
7 training, is the person doing the grooming always the recipient
8 of the sexual gratification?
9 A. No. We know that --
10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I object to this.
11 THE COURT: Sustained.
12 Q. Dr. Rocchio, based on -- without getting into your own
13 particular examples within your own clinical --
14 THE COURT: Counsel, it's a different objection. It's
15 based on my ruling.
16 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, may we be heard at
17 sidebar?
18 THE COURT: You may.
19 (Continued on next page)
20
21
22
23
24
25
2 THE COURT: You may proceed.
3 No, I'm sorry. I sustain the objection.
4 Next question.
5 BY MS. POMERANTZ:
6 Q. Dr. Rocchio, based on your experience, research, and
7 training, is the person doing the grooming always the recipient
8 of the sexual gratification?
9 A. No. We know that --
10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I object to this.
11 THE COURT: Sustained.
12 Q. Dr. Rocchio, based on -- without getting into your own
13 particular examples within your own clinical --
14 THE COURT: Counsel, it's a different objection. It's
15 based on my ruling.
16 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, may we be heard at
17 sidebar?
18 THE COURT: You may.
19 (Continued on next page)
20
21
22
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017924
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document