January 15, 2025
Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS. POMERANTZ | person | 906 | View Entity |
| Dr. Rocchio | person | 187 | View Entity |
| Unnamed Questioner | person | 53 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| MR. PAGLIUCA | person | 1022 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00014932.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio discusses academic literature concerning 'grooming models,' referencing articles by Winters, Bennett, and O'Donohue. He explains that Winters' study attempted to statistically validate behaviors agreed upon by experts and begins to define 'error rates' in psychology using the analogy of a clinical drug trial.
DOJ-OGR-00017920.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Dr. Rocchio, who testifies about the high consistency between what abuse victims report and what offenders admit. Dr. Rocchio states he has treated "hundreds upon hundreds" of patients reporting behaviors consistent with grooming and affirms that the concept of grooming is "very important" for treating childhood sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00017924.jpg
This document is page 51 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It depicts the direct examination of expert witness Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding whether a 'groomer' is always the recipient of sexual gratification. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to the questioning, the objection is sustained by the Court, and Ms. Pomerantz subsequently requests a sidebar conference.
DOJ-OGR-00014934.jpg
This page is a transcript from the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The government moves to admit 'Government Exhibit 5,' an article written by Park Dietz, which is accepted without objection. Dr. Rocchio explains that he provided this article to the government to clarify the concepts of 'grooming' and 'seduction' as established patterns in sexual abuse dynamics, noting specifically how older literature often used terminology that victim-blamed.
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A witness is questioned about their past interactions with detectives.
2017-07-26
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. The topic is photographs taken by an unnamed male.
Date unknown • Not mentioned
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event