Legal Document - DOJ-OGR-00019296 | Trove Document Archive

Processing Document...

0%

Initializing...

Extraction Summary

1

People

2

Organizations

1

Locations

2

Events

0

Relationships

1

Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document

File Size: 445 KB

Summary

This legal document, part of Case 20-3061 dated September 10, 2020, argues for the consolidation of legal cases. The author contends that having separate panels for criminal and civil cases creates an unfair situation, and cites inconsistent rulings from judges in the Southern District of New York as having prejudiced Ms. Maxwell.

People (1)

Name	Role	Context
Ms. Maxwell	Party in legal case	Mentioned as being prejudiced by inconsistent results from the court.

Organizations (2)

Name	Type	Context
Court	Judicial body	Referred to as having two panels on equal judicial footing and supervisory jurisdiction.
Southern District of New York	Court / Government agency	A court over which another court has supervisory jurisdiction, and whose judges have allegedly reached inconsistent r...

Timeline (2 events)

A judicial panel is hearing a criminal case.

View

A separate judicial panel is hearing a civil case.

View

Locations (1)

Location	Context
Southern District of New York	The location of the court whose judges are mentioned.

Key Quotes (1)

"The judges of that court, however, have reached inconsistent results to the prejudice of Ms. Maxwell."

Source

— Author of the document (This statement is used to argue for the consolidation of cases to ensure fair and consistent treatment.)

DOJ-OGR-00019296.jpg

Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (719 characters)

Case 20-3061, Document 17, 09/10/2020, 2928288, Page10 of 15

to relevant and material information (the panel hearing the criminal case) while the other panel will be in the dark (the panel hearing the civil case). This even though two panels of this Court stand on equal judicial footing.

Second, only through consolidation can this Court resolve these issues in a fair and consistent fashion. This Court has supervisory jurisdiction over the Southern District of New York. The judges of that court, however, have reached inconsistent results to the prejudice of Ms. Maxwell.
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]

9

DOJ-OGR-00019296

View Original PDF