DOJ-OGR-00020075.jpg
671 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
671 KB
Summary
This legal document argues for the continued detention of the defendant, Maxwell. It asserts that even though some documentary evidence does not name her, it supports victims' testimonies about their interactions with both her and her co-conspirator, Epstein, making the Government's case strong. The document also dismisses the defense's bail arguments, citing the defendant's foreign ties, transfer of millions to her spouse, and ability to hide as factors that weigh heavily in favor of detention.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in the case, whose name may not appear on all corroborating evidence but is implicated thr...
|
| Epstein | Co-conspirator |
Mentioned as the defendant's co-conspirator. Some corroborating documents refer only to him, but are still used to su...
|
| defendant's spouse | Spouse |
Mentioned as the recipient of millions of dollars in cash transferred by the defendant in the last five years.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | government agency |
Referenced as the judicial body that has previously found the evidence to be a strong case and considered the defenda...
|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned as the prosecuting party whose case against the defendant is described as remaining strong.
|
Relationships (2)
The document explicitly refers to Epstein as 'her co-conspirator' and states that victims will detail their interactions with both of them.
The document states that the defendant 'largely transferred to her spouse' millions of dollars in cash.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,890 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-5608-AJN Document 1002 Filed 08/28/20 Page 15 of 36
and that certain of the corroborating documentary evidence does not specifically name Maxwell. Leaving aside the fact that volume is not a reliable proxy for quality, by its very nature, abusive sexual contact is not the type of crime that leaves extensive documentary evidence. But, as described above, [REDACTED]. To the extent other corroborative documents refer only to Epstein, they still support these victims’ testimony, which will detail their interactions with both the defendant and her co-conspirator, Epstein. In other words, documentary evidence does exist, and as the Court has already found, the combination of multiple victims describing the same scheme, together with documents and other witnesses confirming that those victims did indeed interact with the defendant and Epstein at the times and places they say they did, makes this a strong case. (Tr. 82).
Taken together, this evidence confirms that the Government’s case remains as strong as it was at the time of the defendant’s arrest. Accordingly, this factor continues to weigh heavily in favor of detention.
C. The Characteristics of the Defendant
The defendant’s history and characteristics include significant foreign ties, millions of dollars in cash that she largely transferred to her spouse in the last five years, among other assets, and a demonstrated willingness and sophisticated ability to live in hiding. The bulk of the arguments in the Renewed Bail Motion focus on this factor in a manner that largely rehashes claims that this Court already considered at the July 14, 2020 hearing. Any new information provided was either known by the defense at the time of the initial hearing, assumed to be the case when the Court analyzed this factor at the initial hearing, or, in the case of the defense report regarding
12
DOJ-OGR-00020075
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document