DOJ-OGR-00015150.jpg

753 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 753 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against unsealing the grand jury transcripts from the Maxwell case. It asserts that nearly all the information presented to the grand juries is already public record from Maxwell's trial, and the remaining non-public information is minimal and inconsequential. The document concludes that a member of the public familiar with the trial would learn nothing new from the unsealed materials, which do not identify new individuals, clients, or methods related to Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned throughout the document in relation to her grand juries, trial, indictments, and crimes.
Epstein
Mentioned as an associate of Maxwell in the context of having sexual contact with a minor and their crimes.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
A party in the legal case, which admitted that much of the grand jury information was already public and proposed red...
Court government agency
The judicial body that ordered the review of grand jury materials and whose review confirmed that unsealing them woul...

Timeline (2 events)

Maxwell grand juries, where evidence was presented.
Maxwell's month-long trial, which made much of the information from the grand jury testimony publicly available.

Relationships (1)

Epstein associate Maxwell
The document mentions them together in the context of having had sexual contact with a minor and their shared crimes.

Key Quotes (1)

"The enclosed, annotated transcripts show that much of the information provided during the course of the grand jury testimony—with the exception of the identities of certain witnesses—was made publicly available at [Maxwell’s] trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses."
Source
— The Government (Quoted from the Court's order (Dkt. 800 at 3), where the Government admitted that most of the grand jury information was already public record.)
DOJ-OGR-00015150.jpg
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,223 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 809 Filed 08/11/25 Page 18 of 31
Second, the evidence put before the Maxwell grand juries is today, with only very minor exceptions, a matter of public record. The Government admitted as much in response to the Court’s order: “The enclosed, annotated transcripts show that much of the information provided during the course of the grand jury testimony—with the exception of the identities of certain witnesses—was made publicly available at [Maxwell’s] trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses.” Dkt. 800 at 3. And because the Government proposes to redact the witnesses’ identities, the exception it noted does not reflect information that the public would learn were the grand jury transcripts unsealed.
The Court’s review confirmed that unsealing the grand jury materials would not reveal new information of any consequence. In response to the Court’s order, the Government supplied the Court with a binder highlighting any information that the Government had been unable to determine is public. Only scattered words, clauses, and occasional sentences are highlighted. These items are few and far between.16 The highlighted snippets supply, at most, tertiary details about the same conduct that was the focus of Maxwell’s month-long trial. The same is so for the exhibits put before the grand juries. Save inconsequential portions of a few exhibits, these were received in evidence at Maxwell’s trial. Some were reproduced in the Maxwell indictments.
A member of the public familiar with the Maxwell trial record who reviewed the grand jury materials that the Government proposes to unseal would thus learn next to nothing new. The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor. They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s. They do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s crimes.
16 And the Government’s highlighting is significantly over-inclusive: On the Court’s review of the trial record, a number of items highlighted in fact were covered by testimony at Maxwell’s trial.
18
DOJ-OGR-00015150

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document