Page 12 of a rough draft transcript, marked with a House Oversight Committee identifier. The text records a deposition where a witness is questioned about legal ethics, specifically concerning Rule 11 sanctions, the impropriety of filing pleadings solely to generate publicity, and the necessity of conducting a reasonable investigation to establish a factual basis for allegations.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unidentified Questioner | Interviewer/Attorney |
Asking questions regarding legal ethics, Rule 11 sanctions, and attorney conduct.
|
| Unidentified Witness | Deponent |
Answering questions regarding their understanding of legal standards and ethics.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the document footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
"My understanding is that frivolity is the standard for, for example, rule 11 sanctions."Source
"If that's the only purpose, sure, that it would be inappropriate."Source
"And is it unethical to make allegations without having done a reasonable investigation to satisfy -- for the attorney to satisfy himself or herself that there's a factual basis for the allegations?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (983 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document