Unidentified Questioner

Person
Mentions
25
Relationships
6
Events
28
Documents
11
Also known as:
Unidentified Questioner (Q.)

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
6 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person A. Farmer
Professional
5
1
View
person Loftus
Professional
5
1
View
person Berke
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Parkinson
Professional
5
1
View
person Rocchio
Professional
5
1
View
person Unidentified witness
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Cross-examination of Mr. Berke regarding attorney ethics and reporting juror misconduct. Courtroom (Southern District) View
N/A Court testimony A questioner (Q) conducts a direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi (A), regarding his recogn... N/A View
N/A Court testimony Ms. Brune testifies under oath, answering questions about her process for vetting jurors using ex... Courtroom (implied) View
N/A Deposition A question-and-answer session (redirect examination of Brune) regarding the contents of a documen... N/A View
N/A Testimony Cross-examination of witness Hesse regarding their part-time employment. Court View
N/A Testimony An unidentified witness is questioned about the existence of a hard copy document containing phon... N/A View
2025-01-15 Court testimony Cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio regarding a study on grooming behaviors. Southern District Court (im... View
2022-08-10 Court hearing Direct examination of witness Carolyn as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2022-08-10 Court testimony Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding her claims. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Legal testimony Witness Loftus provides testimony during a direct examination regarding the malleability of memor... N/A View
2022-08-10 Court testimony Cross-examination of a witness named Chapell regarding transactions on an invoice. N/A View
2022-08-10 Court hearing Cross-examination of a witness named Jane regarding a past lawsuit and the presentation of exhibi... courtroom View
2022-08-10 Legal testimony A direct examination of a witness regarding their duties at Shoppers Travel and the company's bil... N/A View
2022-08-10 Legal proceeding Cross-examination of witness Flatley in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Court View
2022-08-10 Legal testimony Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding the commonality and reasons for delayed disclosur... Court in the Southern Distr... View
2022-08-10 Legal proceeding Cross-examination of witness Rodgers in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court testimony Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding the travel habits of Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court testimony A witness named Swain is under direct examination regarding conversations with Annie about her tr... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Legal proceeding Direct examination of witness A. Farmer as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2022-08-10 Cross-examination A witness named Parkinson is being cross-examined about the layout of a floor plan, specifically ... N/A View
2022-08-10 Court testimony Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding their memory of individuals who worked at a ranch. Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Legal proceeding Cross-examination of witness Rocchio in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Court in the Southern District View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding Cross-examination of witness Jane in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding Redirect examination of witness A. Farmer in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00018095.jpg

This document is a court transcript page (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of Mr. Alessi. Alessi testifies about leaving Jeffrey Epstein's employment due to illness and fatigue, and signing a separation agreement that prohibited him from discussing the lives of Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell. He further states that he did not see Maxwell again after leaving, but he did return to Epstein's house one time in 2004 while dealing with marital issues.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020898.jpg

Pages 17 and 18 of a transcript from Case 22-1426 (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell appeal/post-trial hearings). A juror is being questioned about whether they intentionally provided inaccurate answers regarding a history of sexual abuse to get on the jury. The juror admits they did not fill out the questionnaire with diligence because they felt rushed and did not believe they would be selected.

Court transcript / deposition
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018899.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Shawn testifies about his past relationship with a girl named Carolyn, stating they began dating when she was 14 and he was 17. Shawn testifies that Carolyn only held two jobs: one at Arby's and the other working for Jeffrey Epstein.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018573.jpg

This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Maguire (likely an FBI agent) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony focuses on the handling of evidence, specifically CDs and items found in a safe during a search. Maguire confirms that an attorney named Mr. Khan later returned items (in suitcases) that had been missing from the safe after the initial search, and that nothing appeared to be missing from that returned inventory on 'the 11th'.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00030555.jpg

This document is a page from a deposition transcript where a witness describes their work and living situation for an unidentified man. The witness states that they and a partner handled all chores (cleaning, cooking, driving) and stayed at the man's house when he was in town due to the demanding schedule. The man did not allow anyone else in the house, and the witness would return to their own apartment when he was away.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013953.jpg

This document is a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. An unidentified witness testifies about their role at Shoppers Travel, which includes managing daily operations and customer travel bookings. The witness details the company's process for billing customers, which involves charging credit cards or accepting checks, and confirms that invoices are generated and recorded electronically in their QuickBooks accounting system.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013711.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on verifying the timeline of a trip the witness took to Thailand in the summer of 1996 (specifically early July) with a nonprofit organization called Global Roots. The defense attorney presses the witness on the existence of physical records, such as passport stamps or organizational records, to substantiate the specific dates of this travel.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009344.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune. The testimony covers the credibility of government witnesses (lawyers who pleaded guilty to false statements to the IRS), the division of labor regarding jury selection between Brune and Theresa Trzaskoma, and a specific conversation they had at 'the plaza' regarding potential information.

Court transcript / legal testimony
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021933.jpg

This page is a rough draft transcript of a deposition involving the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp 021933). A witness is being questioned about why they filed a motion accusing Professor Alan Dershowitz without contacting him first to verify facts or ask for refutation. The witness explains that the U.S. Attorney's Office had delayed answering a request for consent for months (dating back to Summer 2014), leading to a court filing on January 21, 2015. The witness begins to explain the decision not to contact Dershowitz as a 'cost benefit situation' before the page ends.

Deposition transcript / legal proceeding (rough draft)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021835.jpg

Page 12 of a rough draft transcript, marked with a House Oversight Committee identifier. The text records a deposition where a witness is questioned about legal ethics, specifically concerning Rule 11 sanctions, the impropriety of filing pleadings solely to generate publicity, and the necessity of conducting a reasonable investigation to establish a factual basis for allegations.

Deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012456.jpg

This document is page 61 of a legal transcript where a questioner interrogates a witness about changing their age on a MySpace profile from 18 to their true age, four days before testifying to a Grand Jury. The questioner asks if a detective from Palm Beach instructed the witness to make this change, which the witness denies, also claiming not to remember the specific event or MySpace profile due to having had many.

Legal transcript / deposition
2025-11-17
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
8
As Recipient
0
Total
8

Deposition regarding legal ethics

From: Unidentified Questioner
To: Unidentified witness

Discussion regarding Rule 11 sanctions, the ethics of filing pleadings for publicity, and the duty to investigate factual bases for allegations.

Meeting
N/A

Jury selection process and information verification

From: Unidentified Questioner
To: ["Ms. Brune"]

An unidentified individual questions witness Ms. Brune about why she did not ask Judge Pauley to pose a specific question to a juror, despite having external information and knowing she had the ability to make such a request.

Court testimony
N/A

Jury selection process and information verification

From: Unidentified Questioner
To: ["Ms. Brune"]

An unidentified individual questions witness Ms. Brune about why she did not ask Judge Pauley to pose a specific question to a juror, despite having external information and knowing she had the ability to make such a request.

Court testimony
N/A

The effect of labeling on memory

From: Unidentified Questioner
To: Loftus

An unidentified questioner asks witness Loftus about how memory can be affected by labeling. Loftus explains that applying labels to ambiguous objects (e.g., eyeglasses vs. dumbbells) or events (e.g., incident vs. fight) can alter how they are later remembered and constructed.

Direct examination testimony
2022-08-10

Identification of rooms on a floor plan

From: Unidentified Questioner
To: ["Parkinson"]

An unidentified questioner is cross-examining a witness named Parkinson about a floor plan. They identify the 'staff room' and the 'lake room', and establish that the 'lake room' is where Mr. Epstein's desk was located and from which money was taken.

Cross-examination testimony
2022-08-10

Delayed disclosure of abuse by children

From: Unidentified Questioner
To: ["Rocchio"]

A question-and-answer session where a witness, Rocchio, explains that it is common for children to delay disclosing abuse, often until adulthood, due to various internal and external barriers.

Testimony
2022-08-10

Work duties and living arrangements

From: Unidentified Questioner
To: Unidentified Speaker (A.)

The questioner asks the speaker about their cleaning duties and living arrangements. The speaker explains that they and a partner handled all chores when a specific man ("he") was in town and stayed at his house because of the long hours, but returned to their own apartment when he was away.

Deposition testimony
2017-07-26

Work duties and living arrangements

From: Unidentified Questioner
To: Unidentified Speaker (A.)

The questioner asks the speaker about their cleaning duties and living arrangements. The speaker explains that they and a partner handled all chores when a specific man ("he") was in town and stayed at his house because of the long hours, but returned to their own apartment when he was away.

Deposition testimony
2017-07-26

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity