| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Berke
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Parkinson
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified witness
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of Mr. Berke regarding attorney ethics and reporting juror misconduct. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | A questioner (Q) conducts a direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi (A), regarding his recogn... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Ms. Brune testifies under oath, answering questions about her process for vetting jurors using ex... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Deposition | A question-and-answer session (redirect examination of Brune) regarding the contents of a documen... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Cross-examination of witness Hesse regarding their part-time employment. | Court | View |
| N/A | Testimony | An unidentified witness is questioned about the existence of a hard copy document containing phon... | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio regarding a study on grooming behaviors. | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Direct examination of witness Carolyn as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding her claims. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal testimony | Witness Loftus provides testimony during a direct examination regarding the malleability of memor... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of a witness named Chapell regarding transactions on an invoice. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of a witness named Jane regarding a past lawsuit and the presentation of exhibi... | courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal testimony | A direct examination of a witness regarding their duties at Shoppers Travel and the company's bil... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Flatley in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal testimony | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding the commonality and reasons for delayed disclosur... | Court in the Southern Distr... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding the travel habits of Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | A witness named Swain is under direct examination regarding conversations with Annie about her tr... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Direct examination of witness A. Farmer as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | A witness named Parkinson is being cross-examined about the layout of a floor plan, specifically ... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding their memory of individuals who worked at a ranch. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court in the Southern District | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Jane in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Redirect examination of witness A. Farmer in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
This document is a court transcript page (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of Mr. Alessi. Alessi testifies about leaving Jeffrey Epstein's employment due to illness and fatigue, and signing a separation agreement that prohibited him from discussing the lives of Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell. He further states that he did not see Maxwell again after leaving, but he did return to Epstein's house one time in 2004 while dealing with marital issues.
Pages 17 and 18 of a transcript from Case 22-1426 (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell appeal/post-trial hearings). A juror is being questioned about whether they intentionally provided inaccurate answers regarding a history of sexual abuse to get on the jury. The juror admits they did not fill out the questionnaire with diligence because they felt rushed and did not believe they would be selected.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Shawn testifies about his past relationship with a girl named Carolyn, stating they began dating when she was 14 and he was 17. Shawn testifies that Carolyn only held two jobs: one at Arby's and the other working for Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Maguire (likely an FBI agent) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony focuses on the handling of evidence, specifically CDs and items found in a safe during a search. Maguire confirms that an attorney named Mr. Khan later returned items (in suitcases) that had been missing from the safe after the initial search, and that nothing appeared to be missing from that returned inventory on 'the 11th'.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where a witness describes their work and living situation for an unidentified man. The witness states that they and a partner handled all chores (cleaning, cooking, driving) and stayed at the man's house when he was in town due to the demanding schedule. The man did not allow anyone else in the house, and the witness would return to their own apartment when he was away.
This document is a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. An unidentified witness testifies about their role at Shoppers Travel, which includes managing daily operations and customer travel bookings. The witness details the company's process for billing customers, which involves charging credit cards or accepting checks, and confirms that invoices are generated and recorded electronically in their QuickBooks accounting system.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on verifying the timeline of a trip the witness took to Thailand in the summer of 1996 (specifically early July) with a nonprofit organization called Global Roots. The defense attorney presses the witness on the existence of physical records, such as passport stamps or organizational records, to substantiate the specific dates of this travel.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune. The testimony covers the credibility of government witnesses (lawyers who pleaded guilty to false statements to the IRS), the division of labor regarding jury selection between Brune and Theresa Trzaskoma, and a specific conversation they had at 'the plaza' regarding potential information.
This page is a rough draft transcript of a deposition involving the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp 021933). A witness is being questioned about why they filed a motion accusing Professor Alan Dershowitz without contacting him first to verify facts or ask for refutation. The witness explains that the U.S. Attorney's Office had delayed answering a request for consent for months (dating back to Summer 2014), leading to a court filing on January 21, 2015. The witness begins to explain the decision not to contact Dershowitz as a 'cost benefit situation' before the page ends.
Page 12 of a rough draft transcript, marked with a House Oversight Committee identifier. The text records a deposition where a witness is questioned about legal ethics, specifically concerning Rule 11 sanctions, the impropriety of filing pleadings solely to generate publicity, and the necessity of conducting a reasonable investigation to establish a factual basis for allegations.
This document is page 61 of a legal transcript where a questioner interrogates a witness about changing their age on a MySpace profile from 18 to their true age, four days before testifying to a Grand Jury. The questioner asks if a detective from Palm Beach instructed the witness to make this change, which the witness denies, also claiming not to remember the specific event or MySpace profile due to having had many.
Discussion regarding Rule 11 sanctions, the ethics of filing pleadings for publicity, and the duty to investigate factual bases for allegations.
An unidentified individual questions witness Ms. Brune about why she did not ask Judge Pauley to pose a specific question to a juror, despite having external information and knowing she had the ability to make such a request.
An unidentified individual questions witness Ms. Brune about why she did not ask Judge Pauley to pose a specific question to a juror, despite having external information and knowing she had the ability to make such a request.
An unidentified questioner asks witness Loftus about how memory can be affected by labeling. Loftus explains that applying labels to ambiguous objects (e.g., eyeglasses vs. dumbbells) or events (e.g., incident vs. fight) can alter how they are later remembered and constructed.
An unidentified questioner is cross-examining a witness named Parkinson about a floor plan. They identify the 'staff room' and the 'lake room', and establish that the 'lake room' is where Mr. Epstein's desk was located and from which money was taken.
A question-and-answer session where a witness, Rocchio, explains that it is common for children to delay disclosing abuse, often until adulthood, due to various internal and external barriers.
The questioner asks the speaker about their cleaning duties and living arrangements. The speaker explains that they and a partner handled all chores when a specific man ("he") was in town and stayed at his house because of the long hours, but returned to their own apartment when he was away.
The questioner asks the speaker about their cleaning duties and living arrangements. The speaker explains that they and a partner handled all chores when a specific man ("he") was in town and stayed at his house because of the long hours, but returned to their own apartment when he was away.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity