This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding, filed on February 24, 2012. It captures the cross-examination of a witness named Schoeman by an attorney, Mr. Okula, regarding the timing of a conversation Schoeman had with a Ms. Trzaskoma. The questioning aims to establish whether this conversation occurred on the same day or several days after a juror's note was received in court during deliberations.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Schoeman | Witness |
A witness being questioned on direct and cross-examination about a conversation.
|
| MR. SHECHTMAN | Attorney |
An attorney who conducted the direct examination of Schoeman.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, asks for cross-examination.
|
| MR. OKULA | Attorney |
An attorney conducting the cross-examination of Mr. Schoeman.
|
| Dr. DeRosa |
Mentioned by Mr. Okula as sending his regards to Mr. Schoeman.
|
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma |
The person with whom Mr. Schoeman had a conversation that is the subject of the questioning.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court, as mentioned in the name of the reporting agency.
|
"I can't say exactly when it was. I believe it was during the deliberations either that Friday or sometime the following week."Source
"You said you had this conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma after the note was received in court, is that correct?"Source
"I don't believe it was either the same day or the following day. I believe it was sometime a couple of days or several days later."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,277 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document