Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A period of jury deliberation during which a conversation between Schoeman and Trzaskoma took place.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| juror | person | 81 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009423.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding, filed on February 24, 2012. It captures the cross-examination of a witness named Schoeman by an attorney, Mr. Okula, regarding the timing of a conversation Schoeman had with a Ms. Trzaskoma. The questioning aims to establish whether this conversation occurred on the same day or several days after a juror's note was received in court during deliberations.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Court Recess due to Juror Illness
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
A post-verdict hearing was held where a trial court found a juror demonstrated bias.
Date unknown
A court official outlines the daily schedule and procedure for the jury selection process (voir dire).
2021-12-08 • public courtroom
A trial concerning alleged sex crimes against underage girls, involving sexually suggestive or explicit evidence.
Date unknown
Discussion of the legal doctrine of 'inferred bias' in the context of jury selection and dismissal for cause.
Date unknown
A hearing where a juror gave answers about childhood abuse.
Date unknown
A juror in the Sampson case had been threatened by her husband with a gun, which she did not disclose during a gunpoint bank robbery case.
Date unknown
A juror in the Ashfar case was sexually assaulted by a babysitter when he was five or six years old, which he did not disclose during a child sexual assault case.
Date unknown
In the cited case of Torres, the district court struck a juror for cause because she had engaged in the structuring of cash deposits.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event