This document is a page from a judge's charge to the jury in a criminal case, filed on August 10, 2022. The judge instructs the jury not to be swayed by lawyers' objections or the judge's own rulings and comments, emphasizing that these are matters of legal procedure. The judge stresses that the jury's own recollection of the facts is what governs their decision-making and that statements from counsel are not evidence.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge | Presiding Judge |
The speaker of the instructions, referred to as 'I' and 'my', who makes rulings and gives instructions to the jury.
|
| Lawyers / Counsel | Legal Representative |
Mentioned as having the right and duty to make legal objections on behalf of the government or the defendant.
|
| Defendant | Party in a legal case |
One of the parties in the case, represented by counsel.
|
| Witness | Person providing testimony |
Mentioned as someone the judge may have admonished or directed during testimony.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| U.S. Government | Government agency |
Referred to as 'the government', one of the parties in the criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.' and the (212) area code, likely referring to the U.S. Distric...
|
"You should draw no inference or conclusion for or against any party by reason of lawyers making objections or my rulings on such objections."Source
"Similarly, statements made by counsel when arguing the admissibility of evidence are not to be considered as evidence."Source
"Again, it is your recollection that governs."Source
"Those discussions related to rulings of law, which are my duty, and not to matters of fact, which are your duty to determine."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,613 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document