DOJ-OGR-00017209.jpg

635 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 635 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a judge's charge to the jury in a criminal case, filed on August 10, 2022. The judge instructs the jury not to be swayed by lawyers' objections or the judge's own rulings and comments, emphasizing that these are matters of legal procedure. The judge stresses that the jury's own recollection of the facts is what governs their decision-making and that statements from counsel are not evidence.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Judge Presiding Judge
The speaker of the instructions, referred to as 'I' and 'my', who makes rulings and gives instructions to the jury.
Lawyers / Counsel Legal Representative
Mentioned as having the right and duty to make legal objections on behalf of the government or the defendant.
Defendant Party in a legal case
One of the parties in the case, represented by counsel.
Witness Person providing testimony
Mentioned as someone the judge may have admonished or directed during testimony.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
U.S. Government Government agency
Referred to as 'the government', one of the parties in the criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A judge is giving a charge, or instructions, to a jury as part of a criminal trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
Southern District (implied)
Judge Counsel Defendant Government

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the name 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.' and the (212) area code, likely referring to the U.S. Distric...

Relationships (4)

Judge Professional Jury
The document is a direct instruction from the judge to the jury, outlining the jury's duties and how they should interpret court proceedings.
Judge Professional Counsel
The judge describes having discussions and sidebar conferences with counsel regarding rulings of law.
Counsel Professional (Legal Representation) Defendant
The document refers to 'counsel for either side' which includes the defendant's counsel.
Counsel Professional (Legal Representation) Government
The document refers to 'counsel for either side' which includes counsel for 'the government'.

Key Quotes (4)

"You should draw no inference or conclusion for or against any party by reason of lawyers making objections or my rulings on such objections."
Source
— Judge (Instructing the jury on how to interpret the legal process of objections in court.)
DOJ-OGR-00017209.jpg
Quote #1
"Similarly, statements made by counsel when arguing the admissibility of evidence are not to be considered as evidence."
Source
— Judge (Clarifying for the jury what constitutes evidence versus legal arguments.)
DOJ-OGR-00017209.jpg
Quote #2
"Again, it is your recollection that governs."
Source
— Judge (Emphasizing that the jury's memory of the facts and testimony is paramount, over any statements made by the judge or lawyers.)
DOJ-OGR-00017209.jpg
Quote #3
"Those discussions related to rulings of law, which are my duty, and not to matters of fact, which are your duty to determine."
Source
— Judge (Explaining the separation of duties between the judge (matters of law) and the jury (matters of fact) regarding sidebar conferences.)
DOJ-OGR-00017209.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,613 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 188 of 257
LCKVMAX8
Charge
3022
1 lawyers, follow your recollection.
2 You should draw no inference or conclusion for or
3 against any party by reason of lawyers making objections or my
4 rulings on such objections. Counsel have not only the right,
5 but the duty to make legal objections that they think are
6 appropriate. You should not be swayed against the government
7 or the defendant simply because counsel for either side has
8 chosen to make an objection. Similarly, statements made by
9 counsel when arguing the admissibility of evidence are not to
10 be considered as evidence.
11 If I comment on the evidence during my instructions,
12 do not accept my statements in place of your recollection.
13 Again, it is your recollection that governs. Do not concern
14 yourself with what was said at sidebar conferences or during my
15 discussions with counsel. Those discussions related to rulings
16 of law, which are my duty, and not to matters of fact, which
17 are your duty to determine.
18 At times I may have admonished a witness or directed a
19 witness to be responsive to questions or to keep his or her
20 voice up or to repeat an answer. My instructions were intended
21 only to clarify the presentation of evidence. You should draw
22 no inference or conclusion of any kind, favorable or
23 unfavorable, with respect to any witness or party in the case
24 by reason of any comment, question, or instruction of mine.
25 Nor should you infer that I have any views as to the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017209

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document