| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
unnamed defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witnesses
|
Protective |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Protective |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
third-party administrator
|
Representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kaczynski
|
Political ally |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Adversarial defendant prosecutor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 1
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Tenant landlord |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Hosni Mubarak
|
Political alliance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed individual ('he')
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial prosecution vs defense |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence (Exhibit 268) in the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A photograph of a bathroom was entered as evidence, labeled as Government Exhibit 278, in the leg... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was submitted as evidence, labeled 'Government Exhibit 237', in the criminal case... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, labeled "Government Exhibit 229", in the criminal case S... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Submission of a photograph as Government Exhibit 328 in the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | Court for case S2 20 Cr. 33... | View |
| N/A | Legal action | The government issued a grand jury subpoena to obtain evidence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The trial of Ms. Maxwell, where a jury determined her guilt, is the subject of this motion for a ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence in a legal case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, specifically as Government Exhibit 210, in the criminal ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This document is presented as Government Exhibit 114 for the court case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Federal criminal case designated S2 20 Cr. 330, for which this photograph is an exhibit. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was submitted as evidence, specifically 'Government Exhibit 344', in the criminal... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Indictment of Ghislaine Maxwell by a grand jury drawn from the White Plains Division. | White Plains Division | View |
| N/A | Legal case | The document is an exhibit in the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as Government Exhibit 219 in the court case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, Government Exhibit 207, in the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 3... | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An aerial photograph of an island was submitted as evidence, labeled 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 346', fo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Evidence collection | A photograph was taken as evidence, designated Government Exhibit 294 for case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An ongoing grand jury investigation related to the case, cited as the reason for requesting redac... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence in a legal case, designated as Government Exhibit 214 for... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Submission of a photograph as evidence (Exhibit 115) in the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was used as Government Exhibit 337 in the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A photograph of a bookshelf was entered as evidence in a legal case, designated as "GOVERNMENT EX... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence (Exhibit 273) in a criminal case, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Submission of an aerial photograph of an island as evidence (Exhibit 703) in a legal case designa... | N/A | View |
This document is an email sent to a 'Captain' regarding a past due debt of $2,197.76 associated with a specific invoice due on July 21, 2019. The sender requests payment or updated contact information for accounts payable. The document includes standard confidentiality and export control warnings (ITAR/EAR).
This document is an email dated October 19, 2021, from Nicole Simmons of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to Judge Nathan's chambers in the NYSD. The email serves to submit 'Ms. Maxwell's Motions in Limine' and supporting documents for the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. 20 Cr. 330), done at the request of attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca. The document contains redactions of contact information.
This document is an email dated April 14, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Nathan at NYSD Chambers regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330). The email attaches a letter regarding a Marshall Order and a proposed order for the Marshal. It is copied to other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
This document is an email dated March 16, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the chambers of Judge Nathan (NYSD). Sternheim submits an unredacted Reply Memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's pending bail application under seal, copying other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
This document is an email dated February 23, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and copied to defense team members Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email serves to provide a courtesy copy of a 'Maxwell Bail Application' filed that day in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
This document is an email dated December 8, 2020, from attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Nathan. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of a 'Renewed Bail Motion' and associated exhibits (A-E) in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed under seal pursuant to a court order.
This document captures the metadata of an email sent by attorney Christian Everdell regarding the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Dated December 8, 2020, the email conveys a 'Renewed Bail Motion and Exhibits' to be filed under seal. The email originated from the domain CohenGresser.com and was blind copied to a USAHUB address.
This document is an email dated April 8, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell. Sternheim is sending a courtesy copy of an ECF filing, specifically a reply letter concerning the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center), to redacted recipients and co-counsel including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
This document is an email dated August 2, 2019, from attorney Michael Miller of Steptoe & Johnson LLP regarding 'U.S. v. Epstein'. The email attaches a discovery letter and is copied to several other individuals, including attorneys Reid Weingarten and Martin G. Weinberg. The primary recipients' names are redacted.
An email dated October 15, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330). The email serves to distribute a courtesy copy of a defense filing (Defense_Reply_to_Dkt_350.pdf) to redacted recipients, copying attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated November 24, 2020, regarding the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell'. The email circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing titled 'Maxwell_Reply_to_90-day_conditions_ltr.pdf' to a group of attorneys including Mark S. Cohen, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
This document is an email dated October 28, 2021, from Nicole Simmons of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to Judge Nathan's chambers in the Southern District of New York. It serves as a transmittal for the filing of 'Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support of Her Motions in Limine' in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). The email was sent at the request of attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca.
An email from Nicole Simmons of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to Judge Nathan's chambers, dated October 26, 2021. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the Government's Omnibus Motions in Limine, sent at the request of attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca.
This document is a short email thread from July 25, 2019, regarding the legal case 'U.S. v Epstein, Jeffrey'. An unidentified (redacted) individual confirms receipt of a previous email sent by Goretti Moya earlier that morning. The document bears the ID EFTA00021385.
An email dated July 9, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to a group of recipients including David Oscar Markus, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email circulates a courtesy copy of a legal filing (Reply_to_Order_Dkt_312.pdf) related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. S2 20 Cr. 330).
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) to Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback regarding the investigation into the Epstein estate. The email outlines protocols for producing evidence found at the New York residence, specifically photographs and discs, and raises the issue of whether the estate will waive attorney-client privilege for the purpose of the United States v. Maxwell case.
This document is an email dated November 6, 2021, concerning the transmission of legal discovery material ('3500 material') in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender confirms that files have been uploaded to USAfx for the defense team and that a physical drive will be prepared and sent via FedEx. The email includes several attachments referencing indices, non-testifying witness material, and cover letters.
This document contains an email chain dated November 3, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates courtesy copies of Electronic Case Files (ECF) filings, specifically a bail application and a document regarding the disclosure of juror names. The email is copied to other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
An email dated November 3, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to a redacted recipient, copying attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email serves as a courtesy copy of an ECF filing in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330), specifically attaching a document regarding the disclosure of juror names.
This document is an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorneys (Sternheim and Simmons) communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the submission of Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the EVCP has been served and discusses protocols for redactions and serving the moving parties.
An email dated July 16, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Berman. The email serves to provide courtesy copies of the Government's supplemental submission regarding Jeffrey Epstein's detention, including redacted public filings and unredacted versions requested to be filed under seal.
This document is an email from Nicole Simmons (Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.) to Judge Nathan's chambers in the U.S. v. Maxwell case, dated November 13, 2021. It serves as a transmittal for filing Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. The filing was submitted under temporary seal to allow for potential redactions by the government.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity