Date Unknown
Jane's travel to New York, which the prosecution argues was the result of enticement by the defendant and Epstein.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jane | person | 608 | View Entity |
| defendant | person | 747 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00013834.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues against a defendant's motion to dismiss enticement charges. Rohrbach contends that the defendant, along with an associate named Epstein, manipulated a person named Jane by building a multi-year relationship and playing on her 'hopes and desires' to entice her to travel to New York. This conduct, Rohrbach argues, squarely meets the legal definition of enticement, and therefore the charges should stand.
Events with shared participants
One of three flights shown to the witness, which may have had a passenger with the first name 'Jane'.
1996-01-01
The witness, Jane, hired an attorney, Mr. Glassman.
2019-01-01
Jane's flight from New Jersey to New Mexico.
1997-01-01 • New Jersey to New Mexico
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
Jane's first trip to New York, coinciding with The Lion King release.
1997-01-01 • New York
Jane's trip to Europe with her family.
1998-01-01 • Europe
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
The witness provided a statement to the government, which is the subject of the cross-examination.
2019-09-19
Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.
Date unknown
Cross-examination of witness Jane by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event