EFTA00020246.pdf
60.6 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
60.6 KB
Summary
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated between April 30 and May 3, 2021. The discussion concerns drafting a response to Judge Nathan's order regarding Rule 17 subpoenas related to specific evidence items: 'Diary, boots, photos'. The emails mention reviewing briefs filed by 'BSF/GM' (likely Boies Schiller Flexner and Ghislaine Maxwell) and preparing the response for review by 'the chiefs' before a Tuesday deadline.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Redacted Senders/Recipients | Legal Counsel/Staff |
Staff members communicating about legal drafts, identified as associated with USANYS (US Attorney's Office NY).
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Referenced in relation to a court order on Rule 17 subpoenas (Judge Alison Nathan).
|
| The Chiefs | Supervisors |
Supervisors at the US Attorney's Office who need to review the draft response.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-05-04
Deadline for the response to Judge Nathan's order (mentioned as 'due Tuesday' in the Friday email).
New York (implied)
USANYS Legal Team
Relationships (1)
Drafting response to Judge Nathan's order.
Key Quotes (3)
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,943 characters)
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Diary, boots, photos
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 00:59:01 +0000
Attachments: 2021.05.XX_Letter_to_AJN_re_Requests_9-11_v2_(MC)_(LP).docx
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Diary, boots, photos
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 00:59:01 +0000
Attachments: 2021.05.XX_Letter_to_AJN_re_Requests_9-11_v2_(MC)_(LP).docx
Thank you so much [Redacted] Here are some suggestions on top of [Redacted] comments. Hope you all had a nice weekend!
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2021 8:53 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Diary, boots, photos
Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2021 8:53 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Diary, boots, photos
I’ve read through and looks great— will do another pass first thing and add any stuff on top of [Redacted]
On May 2, 2021, at 7:48 PM, [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]> wrote:
I will circulate some additional suggestions in a bit. Thank you both!
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2021 6:11 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
[Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Diary, boots, photos
Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2021 6:11 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
[Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Diary, boots, photos
Forgot to attach. Here you go.
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2021 6:11 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
[Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Diary, boots, photos
Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2021 6:11 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
[Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Diary, boots, photos
Thanks so much, [Redacted]. My proposed edits and responses to your questions in track. [Redacted]/[Redacted], do you want to review before this goes to the chiefs?
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 1:26 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Diary, boots, photos
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 1:26 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Diary, boots, photos
Hi all,
[Page 2]
Attached is a draft response to Judge Nathan’s order on Rule 17 subpoenas. I’ve also attached her order and the three briefs by BSF/GM, in case they are helpful.
This is due Tuesday, but I’m trying to get this to the chiefs early in case they have strong (and different) views about this.
Happy to discuss, too!
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00020247
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document