This document is page 64 of a rough draft legal transcript, likely from a House Oversight Committee investigation given the Bates stamp. It features an exchange between attorneys Mr. Simpson and Mr. Scarola, and an unnamed witness. The witness denies that Professor Dershowitz abused other minors, and the ensuing dialogue concerns the procedural rules for the witness referring to notes and documents to refresh their recollection versus testifying from memory.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Professor Dershowitz | Subject of Inquiry |
Mentioned in a question regarding whether he abused other minors (Witness answered 'No').
|
| Mr. Scarola | Attorney/Counsel |
Interjects to advise the witness on their right to refer to documents to ensure complete answers.
|
| Mr. Simpson | Attorney/Interrogator |
Conducting the questioning of the witness.
|
| The Witness | Deponent |
Answering questions regarding recollection and evidence.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021887'.
|
"Professor Dershowitz abused other minors? A. No."Source
"MR. SCAROLA: And let me say that you have a right to refer to whatever documents you choose to refer to"Source
"Q. Based on your recollection, I want to know all the evidence you're relying on here?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,051 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document