This document is a court transcript from December 10, 2021, detailing a discussion about a motion to preclude Government Exhibit 52. The judge denies the motion to preclude before trial, opting to hear witness testimony first. The conversation, primarily between the judge and attorney Ms. Moe, clarifies that a witness will authenticate the exhibit by testifying they saw a very similar, but not necessarily identical, book, without knowing how the specific exhibit came into government possession.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney |
Addressed by the court regarding the anticipated testimony of a witness.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaking to the court to clarify the nature of a witness's testimony regarding Government Exhibit 52.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, addressing the attorneys, and seeking clarification on witness testimony related to a mot...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
| U.S. Government | Government |
Mentioned in relation to "Government Exhibit 52" and its possession of the exhibit.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Inferred from the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
"I'm not going to preclude, but I do think this needs to play out at trial. I need to hear the witness testimony and I'll allow voir dire..."Source
"The anticipated testimony, Ms. Comey -- this is for you, Ms. Comey -- the anticipated testimony is that not this exact book but a similar-looking book, characteristically similar, binding, pages, font, etc., was seen by this witness, and she can attempt to authenticate by describing the similarities between what is Government Exhibit 52 and what she saw."Source
"Because this witness has not been informed about how that exhibit came into the government's possession, I just wanted to clarify one small thing, which is that this witness won't say that this isn't one of the -- you know, in particular, that because she recognizes it as one in a series, but doesn't know how it came to the government's possession, it's just identifying it in that way."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,745 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document