DOJ-OGR-00021633.jpg

567 KB

Extraction Summary

1
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 567 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated June 29, 2023, in which a judge is outlining the legal basis for an upcoming sentence. The judge states the applicable guideline range is 188 to 235 months but notes that, due to the Supreme Court's 'Booker' decision, this is only one of many factors to consider. The judge then lists the various sentencing factors required by law (18 U.S.C. 3553(a)), such as the nature of the offense, deterrence, and avoiding sentencing disparities.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Booker
Mentioned as the name of a Supreme Court case ('a case called Booker') that affects sentencing guidelines.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
THE COURT Judicial body
The speaker throughout the document, explaining the sentencing guidelines.
Supreme Court Government agency
Mentioned in reference to its decision in the 'Booker' case, which impacts how sentencing guidelines are applied.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (1 events)

2023-06-29
A judge is explaining the factors and legal framework for determining a sentence in a criminal case, referencing specific legal statutes and precedents.
Courtroom

Key Quotes (3)

"As I have stated, the guideline range applicable to this case is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge is stating the calculated sentencing guideline range for the case at hand.)
DOJ-OGR-00021633.jpg
Quote #1
"Under the Supreme Court's decision in a case called Booker and related cases, the guideline range is only one factor that the Court must consider in deciding the appropriate sentence."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge is explaining that the sentencing guidelines are not mandatory but advisory, citing a key legal precedent.)
DOJ-OGR-00021633.jpg
Quote #2
"I am required to impose a sentence sufficient, but no greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes I have just described."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge is summarizing the legal requirement to impose a sentence that is fair and serves the purposes of the law without being excessive.)
DOJ-OGR-00021633.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,637 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page203 of 217
SA-457
88
M6s2Max2
1
THE COURT: Thank you for your patience.
2
As I have stated, the guideline range applicable to
3
this case is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment.
4
Under the Supreme Court's decision in a case called
5
Booker and related cases, the guideline range is only one
6
factor that the Court must consider in deciding the appropriate
7
sentence. I am also required to consider the other factors set
8
forth in a provision called 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). These include
9
the nature and circumstances of the offense, and the history
10
and characteristics of the defendant; the need for the sentence
11
imposed to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote
12
respect for the law, to provide just punishment for the
13
offense, to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct, to
14
protect the public from further crimes of the defendant, to
15
provide needed educational, vocational training, medical care,
16
or other treatment. I am to take into account the kinds of
17
sentences available, as I have said, the guideline range, any
18
pertinent policy statement, the need to avoid unwarranted
19
sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who
20
have been found guilty of similar conduct, the need to provide
21
restitution as appropriate under the law to any victims of the
22
offense.
23
I am required to impose a sentence sufficient, but no
24
greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes I have just
25
described. I have given substantial thought and attention to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•••
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021633

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document