HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023103.jpg
2.54 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
11
Organizations
7
Locations
1
Events
5
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Interview transcript / article printout
File Size:
2.54 MB
Summary
This document is page 2 of 5 from an interview with white-collar defense attorney Reid Weingarten. He discusses his criteria for accepting or declining clients, the issue of conflicts of interest in law firms, and his assessment of various federal prosecutor offices, specifically highlighting the Southern District of New York as the most formidable.
People (5)
Organizations (11)
Timeline (1 events)
Trial in New Orleans representing BP executive
Locations (7)
Relationships (5)
→
→
to
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
Key Quotes (5)
"The Southern District of New York is the elite prosecutor’s office in the country."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023103.jpg
Quote #1
"I think if I halted, or I was so shocked or appalled or dismayed by the conduct that I’d pull my punches, I’d know that."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023103.jpg
Quote #2
"I break bread with the would-be client."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023103.jpg
Quote #3
"Steptoe & Johnson is a big firm, but it’s not one of the megafirms."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023103.jpg
Quote #4
"If I had nothing but Goldman-like representations, that would be an issue."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023103.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,193 characters)
White Collar Titan Reid Weingarten on Juries Clients and the Scariest Federal Prosecutor... Page 2 of 5
Sometimes their reaction is denial, sometimes shock and horror, sometimes anger, but it’s
always dramatic. The mission at a minimum is to get the client to understand what’s
happening so that he can be effective for me, in terms of my defending him.
always dramatic. The mission at a minimum is to get the client to understand what’s
happening so that he can be effective for me, in terms of my defending him.
LD: Have you ever declined to represent someone because you were so appalled by what
they did?
they did?
RW: At this point, I’m in the fortunate position of turning down more cases than I take. I turn
down cases for many reasons, though it’s not so much that I’m appalled by the behavior.
down cases for many reasons, though it’s not so much that I’m appalled by the behavior.
The way I look at it is, do I bring value? Is there something about me representing the
individual that adds something, as opposed to every other lawyer in town? I think if I halted,
or I was so shocked or appalled or dismayed by the conduct that I’d pull my punches, I’d
know that.
individual that adds something, as opposed to every other lawyer in town? I think if I halted,
or I was so shocked or appalled or dismayed by the conduct that I’d pull my punches, I’d
know that.
I break bread with the would-be client. If there’s a visceral feel, either overtly or covertly, that
I’m not going to want to spend time with him or her, it all factors in. There are often a variety
of factors that cause me to take seriously the potential of the representation, and then I turn
it down.
I’m not going to want to spend time with him or her, it all factors in. There are often a variety
of factors that cause me to take seriously the potential of the representation, and then I turn
it down.
LD: Are conflicts much of an issue?
RW: Steptoe & Johnson is a big firm, but it’s not one of the megafirms. There have probably
been a dozen significant matters I got conflicted out of because of Steptoe’s other
representations. But I have colleagues who work at much bigger firms who are constantly
getting conflicted out of representations.
been a dozen significant matters I got conflicted out of because of Steptoe’s other
representations. But I have colleagues who work at much bigger firms who are constantly
getting conflicted out of representations.
I represented the CEO of Goldman Sachs, and Goldman intersects with everyone in the
world. If I had nothing but Goldman-like representations, that would be an issue. But if you
represent Jesse Jackson Jr. or [other] public officials, as I do, the potential for conflicts is
significantly less.
world. If I had nothing but Goldman-like representations, that would be an issue. But if you
represent Jesse Jackson Jr. or [other] public officials, as I do, the potential for conflicts is
significantly less.
LD: What agency is most likely to strike fear in the heart of defendants?
RW: The Southern District of New York is the elite prosecutor’s office in the country. I don’t
think you’d get much dispute there. They’re aggressive, they’re smart, they have this
enormous home court advantage. Right after them, there are several very fine, very
aggressive, very talented U.S. attorneys offices like Chicago, Boston, EDVA and certainly
the District of Columbia. And you can go to Topeka, Kansas, or Burlington, Vermont, and
find a federal prosecutor who is very smart, has a good case and is talented in court.
think you’d get much dispute there. They’re aggressive, they’re smart, they have this
enormous home court advantage. Right after them, there are several very fine, very
aggressive, very talented U.S. attorneys offices like Chicago, Boston, EDVA and certainly
the District of Columbia. And you can go to Topeka, Kansas, or Burlington, Vermont, and
find a federal prosecutor who is very smart, has a good case and is talented in court.
In the Justice Department itself, there’s the Criminal Division, and the two litigating
sections—the public integrity section, where I was for 10 years, and the fraud section.
They’ve had their ups and downs. As a defense attorney dealing with both sections
regularly, you can have your hands full with either.
sections—the public integrity section, where I was for 10 years, and the fraud section.
They’ve had their ups and downs. As a defense attorney dealing with both sections
regularly, you can have your hands full with either.
LD: Some of the people you’ve represented have been so high-profile. How much of a
challenge is jury selection, and how do you handle it?
challenge is jury selection, and how do you handle it?
RW: By way of example, in my most recent trial I went down to New Orleans. I represented
the former head of exploration for BP, who was accused of lying to Congress about how
the former head of exploration for BP, who was accused of lying to Congress about how
http://www.litigationdaily.com/printerfriendly/id=1202736534962
9/8/2015
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023103
9/8/2015
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023103
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document