DOJ-OGR-00001912.jpg
616 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
616 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020. In it, a prosecutor argues against granting bail to a defendant, claiming she has not been transparent about her finances. The prosecutor states the defendant placed millions of dollars in a trust controlled by a relative and a close associate, has wealth stored abroad, and failed to disclose this information, making her a significant flight risk who has not earned the court's trust.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| unnamed defendant | defendant |
The subject of the court proceeding, accused of not disclosing finances and being a flight risk.
|
| unnamed judge | Honor |
Being addressed by the speaker throughout the document.
|
| unnamed relative of the defendant | relative |
Mentioned as controlling a trust containing millions of dollars of the defendant's assets.
|
| unnamed close associate of the defendant | close associate |
Mentioned as controlling a trust containing millions of dollars of the defendant's assets, along with a relative.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Pretrial Services | government agency |
The defendant had an interview with this agency but did not mention her trust.
|
| the government | government agency |
The prosecuting party in the case, which raised concerns about the defendant's finances and flight risk.
|
| the court | government agency |
The judicial body hearing the case, which the speaker argues cannot rely on the defendant.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the firm that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2020-12-10
A hearing where the government argued against the defendant's release, citing her lack of financial transparency and flight risk.
The defendant had an interview with Pretrial Services where she failed to mention her trust.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as a potential location where the defendant's wealth was stored.
|
Relationships (2)
The document states that a trust with the defendant's assets is controlled by a 'relative'.
The document states that a trust with the defendant's assets is controlled by a 'close associate'.
Key Quotes (2)
"In sum, your Honor, the court has been given virtually no information about the defendant's possession of and apparent access to extensive wealth."Source
— the government (prosecutor)
(Summarizing the argument that the defendant has failed to be transparent about her finances.)
DOJ-OGR-00001912.jpg
Quote #1
"if the court can't rely on this defendant to be transparent at this basic initial stage, the court cannot rely on her to return to court if released."Source
— the government (prosecutor)
(Arguing that the defendant's lack of transparency makes her untrustworthy and a flight risk.)
DOJ-OGR-00001912.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,697 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 35 of 91
k7e2MaxC kjc
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 relative of the defendant and the other appears to be a close
2 associate.
3 Despite having put millions of dollars into this
4 trust, your Honor, and despite its assets being controlled by a
5 relative and close associate, the defendant mentions it not
6 once in her motion before the court or in her Pretrial Services
7 interview; and, in fact, despite the fact that the government
8 said in its opening brief that the defendant's finances and her
9 uncertain amount of wealth, including issues about whether her
10 wealth was stored abroad, are serious concerns with respect to
11 the defendant's risk of flight, the defendant's opposition does
12 not discuss this at all. There is no mention of the
13 defendant's finances and no effort to address those concerns
14 whatsoever.
15 In sum, your Honor, the court has been given virtually
16 no information about the defendant's possession of and apparent
17 access to extensive wealth. The court should not take that
18 concealment, your Honor, we respectfully submit, as an
19 invitation to demand further details, but instead to recognize
20 that if the court can't rely on this defendant to be
21 transparent at this basic initial stage, the court cannot rely
22 on her to return to court if released. In short, she has not
23 earned the court's trust.
24 Finally, your Honor, turning to the defendant's
25 proposed bail package, in light of all of the red flags here --
2 associate.
3 Despite having put millions of dollars into this
4 trust, your Honor, and despite its assets being controlled by a
5 relative and close associate, the defendant mentions it not
6 once in her motion before the court or in her Pretrial Services
7 interview; and, in fact, despite the fact that the government
8 said in its opening brief that the defendant's finances and her
9 uncertain amount of wealth, including issues about whether her
10 wealth was stored abroad, are serious concerns with respect to
11 the defendant's risk of flight, the defendant's opposition does
12 not discuss this at all. There is no mention of the
13 defendant's finances and no effort to address those concerns
14 whatsoever.
15 In sum, your Honor, the court has been given virtually
16 no information about the defendant's possession of and apparent
17 access to extensive wealth. The court should not take that
18 concealment, your Honor, we respectfully submit, as an
19 invitation to demand further details, but instead to recognize
20 that if the court can't rely on this defendant to be
21 transparent at this basic initial stage, the court cannot rely
22 on her to return to court if released. In short, she has not
23 earned the court's trust.
24 Finally, your Honor, turning to the defendant's
25 proposed bail package, in light of all of the red flags here --
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001912
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document