DOJ-OGR-00016788.jpg
483 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
483 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the direct examination of a witness named Richards. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions the witness about a document they reviewed and initialed, which was prepared by Special Agent Kuyrkendall. The witness confirms their initials and that the document was accurate at the time, but notes that the interview in question took place 14 years ago.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Richards | Witness |
Subject of the direct examination, being questioned about a document.
|
| PAGLIUCA | Mr. |
An attorney conducting the direct examination of the witness, Richards.
|
| COMEY | Ms. |
An attorney present in the court, stating she has no objection.
|
| Kuyrkendall | Special Agent |
His name appears on a document being reviewed by the witness.
|
| your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey, representing the court.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (2)
Mr. Pagliuca is conducting a direct examination of Richards, who is a witness.
The document under review contains Special Agent Kuyrkendall's name, and the testimony concerns an interview that took place 14 years prior, implying Kuyrkendall interviewed Richards.
Key Quotes (1)
"It was 14 years ago."Source
— Richards (witness)
(In response to a question about having any current memory of the interview being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00016788.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,224 characters)
CASE 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 59 of 197
LCHVMAX2
Richards - direct
2600
1 what's been marked as JR-1, which is 3505-005 in the 3500
2 material.
3 THE COURT: Okay.
4 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor.
5 MS. COMEY: No objection, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Thank you.
7 MR. PAGLIUCA: So that should be for the witness, the
8 Court, and the courtroom deputy only please.
9 Q. Do you have that on your screen yet?
10 A. I see it, yes.
11 Q. If we look at the lower left corner of this, do you see
12 your name, Special Agent Kuyrkendall's name, and the initials?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. And those are your initials?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. And that means that you at the time reviewed this and
17 determined that it was accurate at the time; is that right?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. Have you had a chance to review this before your testimony
20 here today?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. I understand that this was a long time ago. And I'm
23 assuming, but you tell me if I'm incorrect, that you don't have
24 any current memory of doing this interview?
25 A. It was 14 years ago.
LCHVMAX2
Richards - direct
2600
1 what's been marked as JR-1, which is 3505-005 in the 3500
2 material.
3 THE COURT: Okay.
4 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor.
5 MS. COMEY: No objection, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Thank you.
7 MR. PAGLIUCA: So that should be for the witness, the
8 Court, and the courtroom deputy only please.
9 Q. Do you have that on your screen yet?
10 A. I see it, yes.
11 Q. If we look at the lower left corner of this, do you see
12 your name, Special Agent Kuyrkendall's name, and the initials?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. And those are your initials?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. And that means that you at the time reviewed this and
17 determined that it was accurate at the time; is that right?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. Have you had a chance to review this before your testimony
20 here today?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. I understand that this was a long time ago. And I'm
23 assuming, but you tell me if I'm incorrect, that you don't have
24 any current memory of doing this interview?
25 A. It was 14 years ago.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016788
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document