DOJ-OGR-00013270.jpg
591 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
591 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between the judge (The Court), government counsel (Ms. Moe), and another counsel (Mr. Everdell) about scheduling a charging conference and determining when the defense will rest its case. The parties discuss potential dates, including December 18th, and the possibility of the defense resting on the upcoming Thursday, with the timing contingent on the length of witness cross-examinations.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Mentioned as a person who could possibly be present for a weekend court date.
|
|
| Ms. Moe | Counsel |
A speaker in the transcript, representing the government's position on scheduling.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Counsel |
A speaker in the transcript who asks to confer with the judge.
|
| The Court / Your Honor | Judge |
Presiding over the proceeding, asking questions and making suggestions about scheduling.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
Represented by Ms. Moe, involved in scheduling a conference.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (3 events)
December 18th (proposed)
A proposed date for a charging conference.
Courtroom
The Court
counsel
Thursday (anticipated)
The anticipated day for the defense to rest its case.
Courtroom
defense counsel
Relationships (3)
Both are identified as counsel participating in the same court proceeding, likely on opposing sides.
Ms. Moe addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' and responds to the judge's questions about scheduling.
Mr. Everdell addresses the judge as 'your Honor' while participating in the court proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"It is possible to have Ms. Maxwell present and to make public access available on that weekend date."Source
— The Court
(The judge proposing a scheduling option for a weekend date.)
DOJ-OGR-00013270.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, the government has no preference between those two dates and would be available for a December 18th conference."Source
— MS. MOE
(Responding to the judge's scheduling suggestions on behalf of the government.)
DOJ-OGR-00013270.jpg
Quote #2
"I think it is possible we will be resting on Thursday."Source
— MS. MOE
(Predicting when the defense case might conclude, which affects the scheduling of the conference.)
DOJ-OGR-00013270.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,672 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 257 of 264 1698
LC7Cmax8
LC7Cmax8
1 Saturday the 18th. It is possible to have Ms. Maxwell present
2 and to make public access available on that weekend date. So
3 you can consider if you'd like to do that or not, given where
4 we are in the schedule. I'll leave it to counsel to consider
5 it and confer. Alternatively, I suppose we could talk about
6 the charging conference on the 16th after we finish with the
7 jury. Any thoughts?
8 MS. MOE: Your Honor, the government has no preference
9 between those two dates and would be available for a December
10 18th conference. I think the timing would just depend on the
11 length and pace of the defense case. For example, if the
12 defense case were to begin on Friday, depending on how long
13 that defense case were to last, it may be that we might need to
14 have that conference earlier, but we don't have a sense of the
15 length of the defense case, and so it's hard for us to gauge
16 the timing.
17 MR. EVERDELL: May we confer, your Honor?
18 THE COURT: You may. Let me ask, does the government
19 anticipate -- I know it's a little hard to predict, but do you
20 predict resting potentially by Thursday such that --
21 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. It just depends on the
22 length of cross of the remaining witnesses, but I think it is
23 possible we will be resting on Thursday.
24 THE COURT: Okay.
25 MS. MOE: Thursday of this week.
2 and to make public access available on that weekend date. So
3 you can consider if you'd like to do that or not, given where
4 we are in the schedule. I'll leave it to counsel to consider
5 it and confer. Alternatively, I suppose we could talk about
6 the charging conference on the 16th after we finish with the
7 jury. Any thoughts?
8 MS. MOE: Your Honor, the government has no preference
9 between those two dates and would be available for a December
10 18th conference. I think the timing would just depend on the
11 length and pace of the defense case. For example, if the
12 defense case were to begin on Friday, depending on how long
13 that defense case were to last, it may be that we might need to
14 have that conference earlier, but we don't have a sense of the
15 length of the defense case, and so it's hard for us to gauge
16 the timing.
17 MR. EVERDELL: May we confer, your Honor?
18 THE COURT: You may. Let me ask, does the government
19 anticipate -- I know it's a little hard to predict, but do you
20 predict resting potentially by Thursday such that --
21 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. It just depends on the
22 length of cross of the remaining witnesses, but I think it is
23 possible we will be resting on Thursday.
24 THE COURT: Okay.
25 MS. MOE: Thursday of this week.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013270
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document